Advertisement
| who were the anti federalists apex: 1783-1801. Rule of Federalism James Schouler, 1889 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America, Under the Constitution: 1783-1801. Rule of Federalism James Schouler, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Democratic Republicans of New York Alfred F. Young, 2012-12-01 Through an intensive study of party origins in the state of New York, this volume reexamines and reevaluates the whole of the Democratic Republican movement. It will compel changes in present concepts of anti-Federalist and Republican connections with banking, mercantile, land-speculation, and manufacturing interests. Originally published in 1967. A UNC Press Enduring Edition — UNC Press Enduring Editions use the latest in digital technology to make available again books from our distinguished backlist that were previously out of print. These editions are published unaltered from the original, and are presented in affordable paperback formats, bringing readers both historical and cultural value. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America James Schouler, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Rule of Federalism James Schouler, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America Under the Constitution James Schouler, 1880 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America Under the Constitution: 1783-1801. 1880 James Schouler, 1880 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America: 1783-1801. Rule of Federalism James Schouler, 1908 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: United States, from the Discovery of the North American Continent to the Present Time Julian Hawthorne, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Comparative Federalism Francesco Palermo, Karl Kössler, 2017-10-05 This is the first comprehensive book that explores the subject of federalism from the perspective of comparative constitutional law, whilst simultaneously placing a strong emphasis on how federal systems work in practice. This focus is reflected in the book's two most innovative elements. First, it analyses from a comparative point of view how government levels exercise their powers and interact in several highly topical policy areas like social welfare, environmental protection or migrant integration. Second, the book incorporates case law boxes discussing seminal judgments from federal systems worldwide and thus demonstrates the practical impact of constitutional jurisprudence on policymakers and citizens alike. “This is simply the best analysis of contemporary federalism currently available. It is comprehensive in its coverage, thorough in its analysis, and persuasive in its conclusions. Every student of federalism, from novice to expert, will find benefit from this volume.” Professor G Alan Tarr, Rutgers University “Wading through the thicket of the multiple forms that the federal idea has taken in the contemporary world, this remarkably comprehensive treatise backed by case law fills a long-awaited gap in the literature on comparative federalism. It combines a mastery of the literature on federal theory with a critical understanding of how it plays out in practice. Outstanding in the breadth of its scope, this magisterial survey will serve as a work of reference for generations of scholars who seek to understand how federalism works in developed as well as developing countries.” Professor Balveer Arora, Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi “This book is an extraordinarily handy work of reference on the diverse federal-type systems of the world. It handles both shared principles and differences of perspective, structure or practice with confidence and ease. It will become a standard work for scholars and practitioners working in the field.” Professor Cheryl Saunders, The University of Melbourne “This is a remarkable book – for its sheer breadth of scope, combining detail of practice with analysis of federal principles, and for its fresh look at federalism. With great erudition, drawing on world scholarship and the practice of federalism across the globe, Palermo and Kössler magnificently traverse from the ancient roots of federalism to the contemporary debates on ethno-cultural dimensions and participatory democracy. The book sets a new benchmark for the study of comparative federalism, providing new insights that are bound to influence practice in an era where federal arrangements are expected to deliver answers to key governance and societal challenges.” Professor Nico Steytler, University of the Western Cape |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States Julian Hawthorne, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Political Science Toolbox Stephen E. Frantzich, Howard R. Ernst, 2009 This book is designed to serve as a reliable research companion to students of American government as they navigate their undergraduate programs. It is a no-nonsense guide that assists students as they develop research questions, explore the literature, make use of Web-base resources, analyze data, and present findings. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Citizenship Experiment René Koekkoek, 2020-01-23 The Citizenship Experiment explores the fate of citizenship ideals in the Age of Revolutions. While in the early 1790s citizenship ideals in the Atlantic world converged, the twin shocks of the Haitian Revolution and the French Revolutionary Terror led the American, French, and Dutch publics to abandon the notion of a shared, Atlantic, revolutionary vision of citizenship. Instead, they forged conceptions of citizenship that were limited to national contexts, restricted categories of voters, and ‘advanced’ stages of civilization. Weaving together the convergence and divergence of an Atlantic revolutionary discourse, debates on citizenship, and the intellectual repercussions of the Terror and the Haitian Revolution, Koekkoek offers a fresh perspective on the revolutionary 1790s as a turning point in the history of citizenship. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Politics of Opposition Steven R. Boyd, 1979 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Unruly City Mike Rapport, 2017-05-02 A lauded expert on European history paints a vivid picture of Paris, London, and New York during the Age of Revolutions, exploring how each city fostered or suppressed political uprisings within its boundaries In The Unruly City, historian Mike Rapport offers a vivid history of three intertwined cities toward the end of the eighteenth century-Paris, London, and New York-all in the midst of political chaos and revolution. From the British occupation of New York during the Revolutionary War, to agitation for democracy in London and popular uprisings, and ultimately regicide in Paris, Rapport explores the relationship between city and revolution, asking why some cities engender upheaval and some suppress it. Why did Paris experience a devastating revolution while London avoided one? And how did American independence ignite activism in cities across the Atlantic? Rapport takes readers from the politically charged taverns and coffeehouses on Fleet Street, through a sea battle between the British and French in the New York Harbor, to the scaffold during the Terror in Paris. The Unruly City shows how the cities themselves became protagonists in the great drama of revolution. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The State: Historical and Political Dimensions Richard English, Charles Townshend, 2012-10-12 Drawing on current debates on secessions within the United Kingdom, this book analyses the British State today and looks at its place in the future. Featuring original contributions from a variety of disciplines, this study tackles the problem of defining and studying the state and looks at the role the nation-state has played as the basic political unit in Europe and throughout the world. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: AP U.S. History Krista Dornbush, 2006 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The State Richard English, Charles Townshend, 1999 Drawing on current debates on secessions within the United Kingdom, this book analyses the British State today and looks at its place in the future. Featuring original contributions from a variety of disciplines, this study tackles the problem of defining and studying the state and looks at the role the nation-state has played as the basic political unit in Europe and throughout the world. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Constitution Failed Robert R. Owens, How can you say, The Constitution failed? Don't you mean, We failed the Constitution? Or is that a distinction without a difference? Since the declared and understood purpose to the writing and ratification of the Constitution was to create and sustain a limited government and since We the People now face an unlimited government Dr. Owens maintains we face the painful reality, The Constitution failed. As a member of the Richmond Tea Party and a contributing author to the websites of numerous Tea Parties across the fruited plane Dr. Robert Owens, the author of the History of the Future builds upon Dispatches from that History to show not only that the Constitution has failed but that in many ways that failure was foretold before it was ever ratified by the arguments of the Anti-Federalists. He then goes on to offer recommendations for how We the People can organize and advocate for a solution which will preserve liberty in the land of the free and the home of the brave. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Cult Of The Court John Brigham, 2010-05-27 A fresh and innovative examination of the U.S. Supreme Court as the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Federal Courts, Federalism, and Separation of Powers Donald L. Doernberg, C. Keith Wingate, Donald H. Zeigler, 2008 Law School Publications from West would like to announce that Doernberg, Wingate and Zeigler's Federal Courts, Federalism and Separation of Powers: Cases and Materials, Fourth Edition is publishing in April and the book should reach your desk in mid to late April. Shortly after that, the updated Teacher's Manual will arrive. The new edition includes recent Terms' decisions on standing (Massachusetts v. EPA), federal-question jurisdiction (Grable v. Darue), federal common law, the Eleventh Amendment, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SABIC), and habeas corpus, the last of which now devotes a full section to habeas corpus and the war on terror. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Court Vs. Congress Edward Keynes, Randall K. Miller, 1989 Since the early 1960s the Supreme Court and its congressional critics have been locked in a continuing dispute over the issues of school prayer, busing, and abortion. Although for years the Court's congressional foes have introduced legislation designed to curb the powers of the federal courts in these areas, they have until now failed to enact such proposals. It is likely that these legislative efforts and the present confrontation with the Court will continue. Edward Keynes and Randall Miller argue that Congress lacks the constitutional power to legislate away the powers of the federal courts and to prevent individuals from seeking redress for presumed infringements of their constitutional rights in these areas. They demonstrate that neither the framers nor ratifiers of the Constitution intended the Congress to exercise plenary power over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Throughout its history the Court has never conceded unlimited powers to Congress; and until the late 1950s Congress had not attempted to gerrymander the Court's jurisdiction in response to specific decisions. But the authors contend this is just what the sponsors of recent legislative attacks on the Court intend, and they see such efforts as threatening the Court's independence and authority as defined in the separation of powers clauses of the Constitution. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: United States from the Discovery of the North American Continent Up to the Present Time Julian Hawthorne, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Social Structures John Levi Martin, 2009-07-27 Social Structures is a book that examines how structural forms spontaneously arise from social relationships. Offering major insights into the building blocks of social life, it identifies which locally emergent structures have the capacity to grow into larger ones and shows how structural tendencies associated with smaller structures shape and constrain patterns of larger structures. The book then investigates the role such structures have played in the emergence of the modern nation-state. Bringing together the latest findings in sociology, anthropology, political science, and history, John Levi Martin traces how sets of interpersonal relationships become ordered in different ways to form structures. He looks at a range of social structures, from smaller ones like families and street gangs to larger ones such as communes and, ultimately, nation-states. He finds that the relationships best suited to forming larger structures are those that thrive in conditions of inequality; that are incomplete and as sparse as possible, and thereby avoid the problem of completion in which interacting members are required to establish too many relationships; and that abhor transitivity rather than assuming it. Social Structures argues that these patronage relationships, which often serve as means of loose coordination in the absence of strong states, are nevertheless the scaffolding of the social structures most distinctive to the modern state, namely the command army and the political party. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America: 1783-1801. Rule of Federalism James Schouler, 1913 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Interpretations of American History: To 1877 Gerald N. Grob, George Athan Billias, 1978 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Revolutionary America, 1763-1815 Francis D. Cogliano, 2009-01-27 Revolutionary America explains the crucial events in the history of the United States between 1763 and 1815, when settlers of North America rebelled against British rule, won their independence in a long and bloody struggle, and created an enduring republic. Now in its second edition, Revolutionary America has been completely revised, updating the strengths of the previous edition. New features include: New introduction for the second edition. New chapter on Native Americans. Revised and expanded bibliographic essay. Updated historiography throughout the text. Companion Website with study aids, maps, and documentary resources. Revolutionary America also examines those who were excluded from the immediate benefits and rights secured by the creation of the new republic. In particular, author Francis D. Cogliano describes the experiences of women, Native Americans, and African Americans, each of whose experiences challenged the principle that all men are created equal, which lay at the heart of the American Revolution. Placing the political revolution at the core of the story, Revolutionary America presents a clear history of the War of Independence, and lays a distinctive foundation for students and scholars of the Early Republic. For additional information and classroom resources please visit the Revolutionary America companion website at www.routledge.com/textbooks/revolutionaryamerica. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Constitutional Conservatism Peter Berkowitz, 2013-09-01 Peter Berkowitz identifies the political principles social conservatives and libertarians share, or should share, and sketches the common ground on which they can and should join forces. Drawing on the writings of Edmund Burke,The Federalist, and the high points of post-World War II American conservatism, he argues that the top political priority for social conservatives and libertarians should be to rally around the principles of liberty embodied in the US Constitution and pursue reform in light of them. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: History of the United States of America, Under the Constitution [1783-1865] James Schouler, 1894 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Sierra Educational News California Teachers Association, 1920 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: CTA Journal , 1920 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: AP U. S. Government and Politics,2004 Apex Learning Staff, Kaplan, Learning Apex, 2003-12-23 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Spread the Fed Robert C. Hockett, 2024-11-15 This book provides insight into the history, goals, and potential of the Federal Reserve System (Fed). Synthesizing into a unified vision research and reflections developed over 15 years in the academy and at banking institutions, Robert C. Hockett recovers the sensible founding vision of the early 20th century Fed and updates it to solve the new challenges of the 21st century, especially as America now strives to recover its lost productive preeminence worldwide after decades of outsourcing and consequent deindustrialization. The book presents both the original 1913 Fed and Hockett's modern restored Fed as a unique public/private and federal/local partnership specifically inspired by German industrial development banking and adapted to continent-spanning American conditions. It shows that the original Fed's focus on endogenous money and productive (not speculative) credit allocation was sound and effective as far as it went, while its ignoring exogenous sources of monetary disturbance prevented its properly handling the bubble and bust of the late 1920s and early 1930s. The reaction to that error after the mid-1930s, the book shows, fell into the opposite error, pretending that monetary aggregates could be adequately modulated without being forthrightly allocated in productive rather than speculative directions. A Goldilocks Fed must both productively allocate endogenous money and sensibly modulate exogenous money - twin prerequisites to both productive investment and financial stability. Hockett illustrates how the twelve regional Federal Reserve District Banks were founded for just these purposes and can be revitalized to achieve them anew. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Shape of Utopia Irene Cheng, 2023-08-01 How nineteenth-century social reformers devised a new set of radical blueprints for society In the middle of the nineteenth century, a utopian impulse flourished in the United States through the circulation of architectural and urban plans predicated on geometrically distinct designs. Though the majority of such plans remained unrealized, The Shape of Utopia emphasizes the enduring importance of these radical propositions and their ability to visualize alternatives to what was then a newly emerging capitalist nation. Drawing diagrammatic plans for structures such as octagonal houses, a hexagonal anarchist city, and circular centers of equitable commerce, these various architectural utopians applied geometric forms to envision a more just and harmonious society. Highlighting the inherent political capacity of architecture, Irene Cheng showcases how these visionary planners used their blueprints as persuasive visual rhetoric that could mobilize others to share in their aspirations for a better world. Offering an extensive and uniquely focused view of mid-nineteenth-century America’s rapidly changing cultural landscape, this book examines these utopian plans within the context of significant economic and technological transformation, encompassing movements such as phrenology, anarchism, and spiritualism. Engaging equally with architectural history, visual culture studies, and U.S. history, The Shape of Utopia documents a pivotal moment in American history when ordinary people ardently believed in the potential to reshape society. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: After the Constitution Lance Banning, 1989 Collection of articles previously published. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Future of EU Constitutionalism Matej Avbelj, 2023-02-23 Is there a real and meaningful future for EU constitutionalism? This collection explores this question in light of recent challenges to EU constitutional law; namely the pandemic and the political schisms emerging across the European Union. The contributors explore the question through the prism of the five main pillars of EU constitutionalism: the constitutional values, the EU formal constitutional framework, its substance consisting of the EU political and economic constitution, and conclude by looking at the foundational concept of sovereignty (national and European) in a global realm. Drawing on expertise from both 'old' and 'new' Europe, it gives voice to the most fundamental question facing the Union in its second half century. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: George Washington: A Biography John Richard Alden, 1984 |
| who were the anti federalists apex: The Peasantry in the French Revolution Peter Jones, 1988-10-13 The contention of Georges Lefebvre that the peasantry occupied center stage during the early years of the Revolution is vindicated with the support of fresh evidence culled from archives, unpublished theses and other sources. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Presidential Leadership Pendleton Herring, 2011-12-31 The nature of the presidency is an issue that has been debated since the drafting of the United States Constitution. The Federalists felt a strong executive was the backbone and prime mover of a strong government. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists felt the presidency represented monarchical tendencies and could potentially subvert republican government. How does executive leadership fit in with a limited government with enumerated powers? Does the Constitution require a containment of executive power, even during times of crisis, or do times of crisis warrant an abandonment of a strict legalistic reading of the document? In Presidential Leadership, Pendleton Herring contends that an energetic president is not a threat to existing democratic government rightly understood. He does not advance an entirely Wilsonian response to the Founders on presidential leadership in which the federal government is seen as a pyramid with the president at its apex, and the British parliamentary system is seen as the model. Nor does he reject the Founders' constitutional design. Rather, Herring's conception of presidential leadership requires an executive who has a mastery of administration. The existing system is sufficiently plastic to be able to cope with any national crisis--but the president must be able to work within that system in the most efficient manner possible. Sidney Pearson, in his comprehensive new introduction to this classic work, shows how Herring merges the views of the Founding Fathers with the Liberal-Progressives. He explains that Herring's model of a strong president is one who knows how to grasp opportunities as they arise, and then use them for the common good. Presidential Leadership is a pioneering study of the American presidency that established the standard for presidential scholarship. |
| who were the anti federalists apex: Foundations of Public Service Morgan, Designed to serve as a basic text for an introductory course in public administration, this innovative work provides students with an understanding of the basic management functions that are covered in all standard textbooks. |
I 'was' or I 'were'? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
Feb 14, 2019 · I wish I were young. I wish I were a boy. I wish I were a policeman. I wish I were a rich man. All the above sentences suggest you want to be something you are factually not. In …
What is the difference between "were" and "have been"?
Oct 25, 2021 · What is the difference between "were" and "have been", and are these sentences gramatically correct? 1) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth …
Meaning using "was to" and "were to" in sentence
Nov 5, 2014 · That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past-tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that …
grammar - If you were or if you are? - English Language Learners …
"If you were here 10 minutes ago, "The use of "were" can get more complicated ,the sentences below use the "were to" clause to indicate an element of uncertainty to the actions and …
"Who was" or "Who were"? - English Language Learners Stack …
The question is usually in the same form as the answer. So the answer might be these buildings were designed by Lutyens - the subject of the verb is the buildings. So, the question is "Who …
subjunctives - "if we are to" VS "if we were to" - English Language ...
If we were to meet the Paris climate goals, the use of fossil-based materials must be quickly reduced and replaced with renewable materials. I have seen usage of both "if we are to" and …
grammar - Is it correct to use "were not they ...?" to ask question ...
Jun 22, 2020 · Were not they from London? Both questions are negative and want to know about some people's information/ideas. If it's not something native people would use, what's the …
meaning - This is where you are vs this was where you were?
I would agree entirely with your answer but would just add that if the person is still there I would always say 'Ah, this is where you are'. However if I were discussing it with you later I would …
modal verbs - "Could you...?" vs. "Were you able to...?" - English ...
Jan 17, 2017 · I understand the difference in use between 'could' and 'was/were able to' to refer to a specific achievement. I was able to attend the meeting yesterday. He actually attended the …
subject verb agreement - there was/were a number of - English …
Jul 20, 2022 · There was a person in the room. There were people in room. There were great numbers of people in the street. In the second sentence, great numbers is plural. So, we use …
I 'was' or I 'were'? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
Feb 14, 2019 · I wish I were young. I wish I were a boy. I wish I were a policeman. I wish I were a rich man. All the above sentences suggest you want to be something you are factually not. In …
What is the difference between "were" and "have been"?
Oct 25, 2021 · What is the difference between "were" and "have been", and are these sentences gramatically correct? 1) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth …
Meaning using "was to" and "were to" in sentence
Nov 5, 2014 · That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past-tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that …
grammar - If you were or if you are? - English Language Learners …
"If you were here 10 minutes ago, "The use of "were" can get more complicated ,the sentences below use the "were to" clause to indicate an element of uncertainty to the actions and …
"Who was" or "Who were"? - English Language Learners Stack …
The question is usually in the same form as the answer. So the answer might be these buildings were designed by Lutyens - the subject of the verb is the buildings. So, the question is "Who …
subjunctives - "if we are to" VS "if we were to" - English Language ...
If we were to meet the Paris climate goals, the use of fossil-based materials must be quickly reduced and replaced with renewable materials. I have seen usage of both "if we are to" and …
grammar - Is it correct to use "were not they ...?" to ask question ...
Jun 22, 2020 · Were not they from London? Both questions are negative and want to know about some people's information/ideas. If it's not something native people would use, what's the …
meaning - This is where you are vs this was where you were?
I would agree entirely with your answer but would just add that if the person is still there I would always say 'Ah, this is where you are'. However if I were discussing it with you later I would …
modal verbs - "Could you...?" vs. "Were you able to...?" - English ...
Jan 17, 2017 · I understand the difference in use between 'could' and 'was/were able to' to refer to a specific achievement. I was able to attend the meeting yesterday. He actually attended the …
subject verb agreement - there was/were a number of - English …
Jul 20, 2022 · There was a person in the room. There were people in room. There were great numbers of people in the street. In the second sentence, great numbers is plural. So, we use …
