Advertisement
| proof of abortion papers: The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S., 2018-05-24 Abortion is a legal medical procedure that has been provided to millions of American women. Since the Institute of Medicine first reviewed the health implications of national legalized abortion in 1975, there has been a plethora of related scientific research, including well-designed randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and epidemiological studies examining abortion care. This research has focused on examining the relative safety of abortion methods and the appropriateness of methods for different clinical circumstances. With this growing body of research, earlier abortion methods have been refined, discontinued, and new approaches have been developed. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States offers a comprehensive review of the current state of the science related to the provision of safe, high-quality abortion services in the United States. This report considers 8 research questions and presents conclusions, including gaps in research. |
| proof of abortion papers: The Turnaway Study Diana Greene Foster, 2021-06 Now with a new afterword by the author--Back cover. |
| proof of abortion papers: Parliamentary Papers Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons, 1916 |
| proof of abortion papers: Medical Management of Abortion World Health Organization, 2019-01-30 Medical abortion care encompasses the management of various clinical conditions including spontaneous and induced abortion (both viable and non-viable pregnancies) incomplete abortion and intrauterine fetal demise as well as post-abortion contraception. Medical management of abortion generally involves either a combination regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol or a misoprostol-only regimen. Medical abortion care plays a crucial role in providing access to safe effective and acceptable abortion care. In both high- and low-resource settings the use of medical methods of abortion have contributed to task shifting and sharing and more efficient use of resources. Moreover many interventions in medical abortion care particularly those in early pregnancy can now be provided at the primary-care level and on an outpatient basis which further increases access to care. Medical abortion care reduces the need for skilled surgical abortion providers and offers a non-invasive and highly acceptable option to pregnant individuals. |
| proof of abortion papers: When Abortion Was a Crime Leslie J. Reagan, 1997-01-30 As we approach the thirtieth anniversary of Roe v. Wade, it's crucial to look back to the time when abortion was illegal. Leslie J. Reagan traces the practice and policing of abortion, which although illegal was nonetheless widely available, but always with threats for both doctor and patient. In a time when many young women don't even know that there was a period when abortion was a crime, this work offers chilling and vital lessons of importance to everyone. The linking of the words abortion and crime emphasizes the difficult and painful history that is the focus of Reagan's important book. Her study is the first to examine the entire period during which abortion was illegal in the United States, beginning in the mid-nineteenth century and ending with Roe v. Wade in 1973. Although illegal, millions of abortions were provided during these years to women of every class, race, and marital status. The experiences and perspectives of these women, as well as their physicians and midwives, are movingly portrayed here. Reagan traces the practice and policing of abortion. While abortions have been typically portrayed as grim back alley operations, she finds that abortion providers often practiced openly and safely. Moreover, numerous physicians performed abortions, despite prohibitions by the state and the American Medical Association. Women often found cooperative practitioners, but prosecution, public humiliation, loss of privacy, and inferior medical care were a constant threat. Reagan's analysis of previously untapped sources, including inquest records and trial transcripts, shows the fragility of patient rights and raises provocative questions about the relationship between medicine and law. With the right to abortion again under attack in the United States, this book offers vital lessons for every American concerned with health care, civil liberties, and personal and sexual freedom. |
| proof of abortion papers: Women's Health After Abortion Elizabeth Ring-Cassidy, Ian Gentles, deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research, 2002 A compelling account of the research on post-abortion difficulties, both short-term and long-term. Although the authors often touch upon technical matters, they write with a humanity and clarity that makes their conclusions readily accessible to the general reader. |
| proof of abortion papers: Before Roe V. Wade Reva B. Siegel, 2012 As the landmark Roe v. Wade decision reaches its 40th anniversary, abortion remains a polarizing topic on America's legal and political landscape. Blending history, culture, and law, Before Roe v. Wade eplores the roots of the conflict, recovering through original documents and first-hand accounts the voices on both sides that helped shape the climate in which the Supreme Court ruled. Originally published in 2010, this new edition includes a new Afterword that explores what the history of conflict before Roe teaches us about the abortion conflict we live with today. Examining the role of social movements and political parties, the authors cast new light on a pivotal chapter in American history and suggest how Roe v. Wade, the case, because Roe v. Wade, the symbol. --Cover, p. 4. |
| proof of abortion papers: Records of the Proceedings and Printed Papers of the Parliament Australia. Parliament, 1908 |
| proof of abortion papers: Sessional Papers Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons, 1908 |
| proof of abortion papers: Joint Volumes of Papers Presented to the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly New South Wales. Parliament, 1905 Includes various departmental reports and reports of commissions. Cf. Gregory. Serial publications of foreign governments, 1815-1931. |
| proof of abortion papers: Official Documents, Comprising the Department and Other Reports Made to the Governor, Senate and House of Representatives of Pennsylvania , 1899 |
| proof of abortion papers: Sessional Papers , 1868 Report of the Dominion fishery commission on the fisheries of the province of Ontario, 1893, issued as vol. 26, no. 7, supplement. |
| proof of abortion papers: Contemporary Bioethics Mohammed Ali Al-Bar, Hassan Chamsi-Pasha, 2015-05-27 This book discusses the common principles of morality and ethics derived from divinely endowed intuitive reason through the creation of al-fitr' a (nature) and human intellect (al-‘aql). Biomedical topics are presented and ethical issues related to topics such as genetic testing, assisted reproduction and organ transplantation are discussed. Whereas these natural sources are God’s special gifts to human beings, God’s revelation as given to the prophets is the supernatural source of divine guidance through which human communities have been guided at all times through history. The second part of the book concentrates on the objectives of Islamic religious practice – the maqa' sid – which include: Preservation of Faith, Preservation of Life, Preservation of Mind (intellect and reason), Preservation of Progeny (al-nasl) and Preservation of Property. Lastly, the third part of the book discusses selected topical issues, including abortion, assisted reproduction devices, genetics, organ transplantation, brain death and end-of-life aspects. For each topic, the current medical evidence is followed by a detailed discussion of the ethical issues involved. |
| proof of abortion papers: Sessional Papers British Columbia, 1910 |
| proof of abortion papers: Living in the Crosshairs David S. Cohen, Krysten Connon, 2015 A chilling exposé of the threats, harassment, and worse that American abortion providers face on a daily basis-and groundbreaking remedies to stop it |
| proof of abortion papers: Sessional Papers of the Dominion of Canada Canada. Parliament, 1913 Report of the Dominion fishery commission on the fisheries of the province of Ontario, 1893, issued as vol. 26, no. 7, supplement. |
| proof of abortion papers: Complications Angela Lanfranchi, I. J. Gentles, Elizabeth Ring-Cassidy, 2018 This book... arises out of a concern that the steadily growing body of information about the harmful complications of abortion for women and their subsequent children should become widely known. These complications are physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. -- |
| proof of abortion papers: New York Legislative Documents New York (State). Legislature, 1922 |
| proof of abortion papers: Sessional Papers British Columbia. Legislative Assembly, 1910 |
| proof of abortion papers: Sessional Papers Canada. Parliament, 1868 Report of the Dominion fishery commission on the fisheries of the province of Ontario, 1893, issued as vol. 26, no. 7, supplement. |
| proof of abortion papers: Thinking Critically About Abortion Nathan Nobis, Kristina Grob, 2019-06-19 This book introduces readers to the many arguments and controversies concerning abortion. While it argues for ethical and legal positions on the issues, it focuses on how to think about the issues, not just what to think about them. It is an ideal resource to improve your understanding of what people think, why they think that and whether their (and your) arguments are good or bad, and why. It's ideal for classroom use, discussion groups, organizational learning, and personal reading. From the Preface To many people, abortion is an issue for which discussions and debates are frustrating and fruitless: it seems like no progress will ever be made towards any understanding, much less resolution or even compromise. Judgments like these, however, are premature because some basic techniques from critical thinking, such as carefully defining words and testing definitions, stating the full structure of arguments so each step of the reasoning can be examined, and comparing the strengths and weaknesses of different explanations can help us make progress towards these goals. When emotions run high, we sometimes need to step back and use a passion for calm, cool, critical thinking. This helps us better understand the positions and arguments of people who see things differently from us, as well as our own positions and arguments. And we can use critical thinking skills help to try to figure out which positions are best, in terms of being supported by good arguments: after all, we might have much to learn from other people, sometimes that our own views should change, for the better. Here we use basic critical thinking skills to argue that abortion is typically not morally wrong. We begin with less morally-controversial claims: adults, children and babies are wrong to kill and wrong to kill, fundamentally, because they, we, are conscious, aware and have feelings. We argue that since early fetuses entirely lack these characteristics, they are not inherently wrong to kill and so most abortions are not morally wrong, since most abortions are done early in pregnancy, before consciousness and feeling develop in the fetus. Furthermore, since the right to life is not the right to someone else’s body, fetuses might not have the right to the pregnant woman’s body—which she has the right to—and so she has the right to not allow the fetus use of her body. This further justifies abortion, at least until technology allows for the removal of fetuses to other wombs. Since morally permissible actions should be legal, abortions should be legal: it is an injustice to criminalize actions that are not wrong. In the course of arguing for these claims, we: 1. discuss how to best define abortion; 2. dismiss many common “question-begging” arguments that merely assume their conclusions, instead of giving genuine reasons for them; 3. refute some often-heard “everyday arguments” about abortion, on all sides; 4. explain why the most influential philosophical arguments against abortion are unsuccessful; 5. provide some positive arguments that at least early abortions are not wrong; 6. briefly discuss the ethics and legality of later abortions, and more. This essay is not a “how to win an argument” piece or a tract or any kind of apologetics. It is not designed to help anyone “win” debates: everybody “wins” on this issue when we calmly and respectfully engage arguments with care, charity, honesty and humility. This book is merely a reasoned, systematic introduction to the issues that we hope models these skills and virtues. Its discussion should not be taken as absolute “proof” of anything: much more needs to be understood and carefully discussed—always. |
| proof of abortion papers: Abortion United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, 1974 |
| proof of abortion papers: Stewart's Purdon's Digest Pennsylvania, 1905 |
| proof of abortion papers: The Law of Evidence Sidney Lovell Phipson, 1921 |
| proof of abortion papers: The Abortion Resource Handbook K. Kaufmann, 1997-07-16 The Abortion Resource Handbook covers such issues as finding a safe, pro-choice clinic, dealing with parental consent and other restrictive laws, dealing with anti-choice protesters, and more. Includes a summary of state laws and a listing of pro-choice organizations nationwide. Line drawings. |
| proof of abortion papers: Wisconsin Statutes, 1953 Wisconsin, 1953 |
| proof of abortion papers: 35th Anniversary Retrospective Konstantinos Tatsiramos, Solomon W. Polachek, 2012-09-25 To commemorate Research in Labor Economics s 35th anniversary, this retrospective edition contains 20 of the most influential Research in Labor Economics articles along with new introductory prefatory updates written by the original authors. |
| proof of abortion papers: Abortion, Motherhood, and Mental Health Ellie Lee, Whatever reproductive choices women make--whether they opt to end a pregnancy through abortion or continue to term and give birth--they are considered to be at risk of suffering serious mental health problems. According to opponents of abortion in the United States, potential injury to women is a major reason why people should consider abortion a problem. On the other hand, becoming a mother can also be considered a big risk. This fine, well-balanced book is about how people represent the results of reproductive choices. It examines how and why pregnancy and its various outcomes have come to be discussed this way. The author's interest in the medicalization of reproduction--its representation as a mental health problem--first arose in relation to abortion. There is a very clear contrast between the construction of women who have abortions, implied by moralized argument against abortion, and the construction that results when the case against abortion focuses on its effects on women's mental health. Lee argues that claims that connect abortion with mental illness have been limited in their influence, but this is not to suggest that they have not become a focus for discussion and have had no impact. The limits to such claims about abortion do not, by any means, suggest limits to the process of the medicalization of pregnancy more broadly, that is, a process of demedicalization. The final theme of Ellie Lee's book is the selective medicalization of reproduction. Centering on the claim that abortion can create a post abortion syndrome, the author examines the medicalization of the abortion problem on both sides of the Atlantic. Lee points to contrasts in legal and medical dimensions of the abortion issue that make for some important differences, but argues that in both the United States and Great Britain, the post-abortion-syndrome claim constitutes an example of the limits to medicalization and the return to the theme of motherhood as a psychological ordeal. Lee makes the case for looking to the social dimensions of mental health problems to account for and understand debates about what makes women ill. Ellie Lee is research fellow in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Southampton, Highfield, United Kingdom. |
| proof of abortion papers: The American Digest , 1894 |
| proof of abortion papers: An Index-digest of Leading Articles, Legal Essays, Abstracts of Decisions, Reviews of Legal Literature, Legal Miscellany and Leading Cases , 1881 |
| proof of abortion papers: Decriminalising Abortion in the UK Sally Sheldon, Kaye Wellings, 2020-03-23 Available Open Access under CC-BY-NC licence. The public and parliamentary debate about UK abortion law reform is often diverted away from key moral and political questions by disputes regarding basic questions of fact. And all too often, claims of scientific ‘fact’ are ideologically driven. But what effect would decriminalisation be likely to have on women’s health? What would be the impact on the incidence of abortions? Would decriminalisation equate to deregulation, sweeping away necessary restrictions on dangerous or malicious conduct? With each chapter written by leading experts in the fields of medicine, law, reproductive health and social science, this book offers a concise and authoritative account of the evidence regarding the likely impact of decriminalisation of abortion in the UK. |
| proof of abortion papers: scientific papers of william bateson , |
| proof of abortion papers: Remington's Compiled Statutes of Washington Annotated (cite Rem. Comp. Stat.) Washington (State), Arthur Remington, 1922 |
| proof of abortion papers: Remington's Compiled Statutes of Washington Annotated Washington (State), Arthur Remington, 1922 |
| proof of abortion papers: Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Maryland Maryland. Court of Appeals, 1875 |
| proof of abortion papers: Fetal Medicine Bidyut Kumar, Zarko Alfirevic, 2016-04-07 Based on the RCOG Training Module in Fetal Medicine, this book provides a knowledge base for practitioners in obstetrics and maternal-fetal medicine. |
| proof of abortion papers: Complications of Abortion World Health Organization, 1995 Sets out guidelines that can help reduce the high levels of maternal morbidity and mortality associated with abortion whether spontaneous or induced. Recommendations and advice are backed by extensive practical experience and rooted in the principle that emergency care for the complications of abortion should be available 24 hours a day in every health care system. In view of the need to prevent life-threatening complications the book also establishes standards of safe abortion practice for use in those countries where abortion is permitted by law. Prevention of abortion through education and family planning is likewise discussed. Addressed to health managers administrators and care providers the book follows a step-by-step approach to the provision of emergency and preventive care. The first three chapters describe the magnitude of mortality and morbidity caused by unsafe abortions define the essential components of abortion care at each level in the health system and discuss the ways in which legal and societal factors affect abortion behaviour and care. Against this background the remaining eleven chapters provide technical and managerial guidelines for each component of service at each level of the health system needed to ensure that all women have access to care 24 hours a day. A chapter on planning is followed by three chapters outlining the clinical elements of emergency abortion care. Of particular value is a chapter on patient information and counselling which emphasizes the importance of providing information in a supportive manner. Other chapters offer detailed guidance on the facilities equipment and drugs needed for abortion care on the training and supervision of staff and on ways to overcome several obstacles that make it difficult for women in remote rural areas to receive timely care. |
| proof of abortion papers: Manila City Directory , 1921 |
| proof of abortion papers: Qualitative Evidence of Adolescents' Sexual and Reproductive Health Experiences in Malawi Alister C. Munthali, 2006 |
| proof of abortion papers: The Law Times , 1844 |
Proof by Southern Glazer's
Proof, our industry-leading online shopping and account management platform, simplifies ordering wine, spirits, beer & more for licensed beverage businesses.
PROOF Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of PROOF is the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact. How to use proof in a sentence.
Proof (rapper) - Wikipedia
DeShaun Dupree Holton (October 2, 1973 – April 11, 2006), known professionally as Proof, was an American rapper from Detroit, Michigan. During his career, he was a member of the groups 5 …
PROOF | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
PROOF definition: 1. a fact or piece of information that shows that something exists or is true: 2. a logical…. Learn more.
Proof Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary
PROOF meaning: 1 : something which shows that something else is true or correct often + of; 2 : an act or process of showing that something is true
Proof vs. Prove – What’s the Difference? - Writing Explained
In the majority of cases, prove is a verb, while proof is a noun. There are rare exceptions to this rule, but they should be avoided in formal writing.
Proof - definition of proof by The Free Dictionary
proof - any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something; "if you have any proof for what you say, now is the time to produce it"
‘Prove’ vs ‘Proof’: What’s the Difference Between the Two?
Mar 28, 2024 · ‘Prove’ is a verb that means to show something is true through evidence or argument. For example, “She wants to prove her theory.” On the other hand, ‘proof’ is a noun …
proof noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes ...
Definition of proof noun in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.
proof - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jan 2, 2025 · proof (countable and uncountable, plural proofs) (countable) An effort, process, or operation designed to establish or discover a fact or truth; an act of testing; a test; a trial. A given …
Proof by Southern Glazer's
Proof, our industry-leading online shopping and account management platform, simplifies ordering wine, spirits, beer & more for licensed beverage businesses.
PROOF Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of PROOF is the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact. How to use proof in a sentence.
Proof (rapper) - Wikipedia
DeShaun Dupree Holton (October 2, 1973 – April 11, 2006), known professionally as Proof, was an American rapper from Detroit, Michigan. During his career, he was a member of the groups …
PROOF | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
PROOF definition: 1. a fact or piece of information that shows that something exists or is true: 2. a logical…. Learn more.
Proof Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary
PROOF meaning: 1 : something which shows that something else is true or correct often + of; 2 : an act or process of showing that something is true
Proof vs. Prove – What’s the Difference? - Writing Explained
In the majority of cases, prove is a verb, while proof is a noun. There are rare exceptions to this rule, but they should be avoided in formal writing.
Proof - definition of proof by The Free Dictionary
proof - any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something; "if you have any proof for what you say, now is the time to produce it"
‘Prove’ vs ‘Proof’: What’s the Difference Between the Two?
Mar 28, 2024 · ‘Prove’ is a verb that means to show something is true through evidence or argument. For example, “She wants to prove her theory.” On the other hand, ‘proof’ is a noun …
proof noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes ...
Definition of proof noun in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.
proof - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jan 2, 2025 · proof (countable and uncountable, plural proofs) (countable) An effort, process, or operation designed to establish or discover a fact or truth; an act of testing; a test; a trial. A …
