Advertisement
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equal Justice Under Law Constance Baker Motley, 1999-09-10 A civil rights lawyer who became the first African American female federal judge, describes her career, including working with Thurgood Marshall's NAACP legal team. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Justice Deferred Orville Vernon Burton, Armand Derfner, 2021-05-04 In the first comprehensive accounting of the U.S. Supreme CourtÕs race-related jurisprudence, a distinguished historian and renowned civil rights lawyer scrutinize a legacy too often blighted by racial injustice. The Supreme Court is usually seen as protector of our liberties: it ended segregation, was a guarantor of fair trials, and safeguarded free speech and the vote. But this narrative derives mostly from a short period, from the 1930s to the early 1970s. Before then, the Court spent a century largely ignoring or suppressing basic rights, while the fifty years since 1970 have witnessed a mostly accelerating retreat from racial justice. From the Cherokee Trail of Tears to Brown v. Board of Education to the dismantling of the Voting Rights Act, historian Orville Vernon Burton and civil rights lawyer Armand Derfner shine a powerful light on the CourtÕs race recordÑa legacy at times uplifting, but more often distressing and sometimes disgraceful. For nearly a century, the Court ensured that the nineteenth-century Reconstruction amendments would not truly free and enfranchise African Americans. And the twenty-first century has seen a steady erosion of commitments to enforcing hard-won rights. Justice Deferred is the first book that comprehensively charts the CourtÕs race jurisprudence. Addressing nearly two hundred cases involving AmericaÕs racial minorities, the authors probe the parties involved, the justicesÕ reasoning, and the impact of individual rulings. We learn of heroes such as Thurgood Marshall; villains, including Roger Taney; and enigmas like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Hugo Black. Much of the fragility of civil rights in America is due to the Supreme Court, but as this sweeping history also reminds us, the justices still have the power to make good on the countryÕs promise of equal rights for all. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: "Equal Justice Under Law." United States. Department of Justice, 1977 Anthology of addresses by prominent authorities on legal topics relating to the Bicentennial. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Reimagining To Kill a Mockingbird Austin Sarat, Martha Merrill Umphrey, 2013 Reevaluates the legal and cultural significance of an iconic American film |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equal Justice Under the Law Thomas R. Van Dervort, 1994 This textbook is designed for students at all levels who seek an introduction to American law and judicial processes. After explaining basic terms and concepts in Part I, it then uses hypothetical cases to explain the more detailed terms and concepts associated with civil, criminal, and administrative due process. The text's principle focus is on the procedures of the American legal system. Students will be provided basic instruction in how to read and understand case law, do basic legal research, and understand fundamental civil, criminal, and administrative legal procedures. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: A Theory of Justice John RAWLS, 2009-06-30 Though the revised edition of A Theory of Justice, published in 1999, is the definitive statement of Rawls's view, so much of the extensive literature on Rawls's theory refers to the first edition. This reissue makes the first edition once again available for scholars and serious students of Rawls's work. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equal Justice in the Balance Raneta Lawson Mack, Michael J. Kelly, 2009-11-11 We are in difficult times for the protection of our liberties. Nonetheless, citizens are showing an increased willingness to resist the erosion of the U.S. Constitution. . . . Lawson Mack and Kelly stress the importance of not giving up these fundamental rights and conclude with a message of optimism, noting an increased backlash against the administration's more draconian measures. Although the landscape is still quite bleak, change is in the air. -Michael Ratner, President, Center for Constitutional Rights, from the foreword A compelling and sophisticated critique of the U.S. government's post-9/11 actions. Mack and Kelly set the stage with the historical perspective on America's response to terrorism and the assessment of terrorist threats, before launching into a comprehensive analysis of the USA Patriot Act. Their hard-hitting approach and easy-to-read style makes for a fascinating treatment of the government's legislative and executive response to the attacks. -Michael P. Scharf, Case Western Reserve University School of Law With its sweeping critique of the USA Patriot Act and the Bush administration's maneuvers in pursuit of terrorists, Equal Justice in the Balance is a sobering and exacting look at American legal responses to terrorism, both before and after 9/11. The authors detail wide-ranging and persuasive evidence that American antiterrorism legislation has led to serious infringements of our civil rights. They show us how deviations from our fundamental principles of fairness and justice in times of heightened national anxiety-whether the Red Scare, World War II, or the War on Terrorism-have resulted in overreaction and excess, later requiring apologies and reparations to those victimized by a paranoia-driven justice system. While terrorist attacks-especially on a large scale and on American soil-damage our national pride and sense of security, the authors offer powerful arguments for why we must allow our judicial infrastructure, imperfect as it is, to respond without undue interference from the politics of anger and vengeance. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Constitutional Law of Canada Peter W. Hogg, 2020 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Access to Justice in Iran Sahar Maranlou, 2015 A critical and in-depth analysis of access to justice from international and Islamic perspectives, with a specific focus on access by women. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Negotiating the Power of the People Lucia Rubinelli, 2020-05-21 Explores the history of the idea of constituent power over five key events, from the French Revolution to the present. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Ethical Principles for Judges Canadian Judicial Council, 1998 This publication is the latest in a series of steps to assist judges in carrying out their onerous responsibilities, and represents a concise yet comprehensive set of principles addressing the many difficult ethical issues that confront judges as they work and live in their communities. It also provides a sound basis to promote a more complete understanding of the role of the judge in society and of the ethical dilemmas they so often encounter. Sections of the publication cover the following: the purpose of the publication; judicial independence; integrity; diligence; equality; and impartiality, including judicial demeanour, civic and charitable activity, political activity, and conflicts of interest. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: The Federalist Papers Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, 2018-08-20 Classic Books Library presents this brand new edition of “The Federalist Papers”, a collection of separate essays and articles compiled in 1788 by Alexander Hamilton. Following the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776, the governing doctrines and policies of the States lacked cohesion. “The Federalist”, as it was previously known, was constructed by American statesman Alexander Hamilton, and was intended to catalyse the ratification of the United States Constitution. Hamilton recruited fellow statesmen James Madison Jr., and John Jay to write papers for the compendium, and the three are known as some of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Alexander Hamilton (c. 1755–1804) was an American lawyer, journalist and highly influential government official. He also served as a Senior Officer in the Army between 1799-1800 and founded the Federalist Party, the system that governed the nation’s finances. His contributions to the Constitution and leadership made a significant and lasting impact on the early development of the nation of the United States. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equal Justice Under Law Carroll Collier Moreland, 1957 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Indian Police and Equal Justice Under Law James Vadackumchery, 1999 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: A First Nations Voice in the Australian Constitution Shireen Morris, 2020-08-06 This book makes the legal and political case for Indigenous constitutional recognition through a constitutionally guaranteed First Nations voice, as advocated by the historic Uluru Statement from the Heart. It argues that a constitutional amendment to empower Indigenous peoples with a fairer say in laws and policies made about them and their rights, is both constitutionally congruent and politically achievable. A First Nations voice is deeply in keeping with the culture, design and philosophy of Australia's federal Constitution, as well as the long history of Indigenous advocacy for greater empowerment and self-determination in their affairs. Morris explores the historical, political, theoretical and international contexts underpinning the contemporary debate, before delving into the constitutional detail to craft a compelling case for change. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Race and the Jury Hiroshi Fukurai, Edgar W. Butler, Richard Krooth, 1993-01-31 In this timely volume, the authors provide a penetrating analysis of the institutional mechanisms perpetuating the related problems of minorities' disenfranchisement and their underrepresentation on juries. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Keeping Faith with the Constitution Goodwin Liu, Pamela S. Karlan, Christopher H. Schroeder, 2010-08-05 Chief Justice John Marshall argued that a constitution requires that only its great outlines should be marked [and] its important objects designated. Ours is intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. In recent years, Marshall's great truths have been challenged by proponents of originalism and strict construction. Such legal thinkers as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia argue that the Constitution must be construed and applied as it was when the Framers wrote it. In Keeping Faith with the Constitution, three legal authorities make the case for Marshall's vision. They describe their approach as constitutional fidelity--not to how the Framers would have applied the Constitution, but to the text and principles of the Constitution itself. The original understanding of the text is one source of interpretation, but not the only one; to preserve the meaning and authority of the document, to keep it vital, applications of the Constitution must be shaped by precedent, historical experience, practical consequence, and societal change. The authors range across the history of constitutional interpretation to show how this approach has been the source of our greatest advances, from Brown v. Board of Education to the New Deal, from the Miranda decision to the expansion of women's rights. They delve into the complexities of voting rights, the malapportionment of legislative districts, speech freedoms, civil liberties and the War on Terror, and the evolution of checks and balances. The Constitution's framers could never have imagined DNA, global warming, or even women's equality. Yet these and many more realities shape our lives and outlook. Our Constitution will remain vital into our changing future, the authors write, if judges remain true to this rich tradition of adaptation and fidelity. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Thurgood Marshall Juan Williams, 2011-06-22 A NEW YORK TIMES NOTABLE BOOK • The definitive biography of the great lawyer and Supreme Court justice, from the bestselling author of Eyes on the Prize “Magisterial . . . in Williams’ richly detailed portrait, Marshall emerges as a born rebel.”—Jack E. White, Time Thurgood Marshall was the twentieth century’s great architect of American race relations. His victory in the Brown v. Board of Education decision, the landmark Supreme Court case outlawing school segregation in the United States, would have made him a historic figure even if he had never been appointed as the first African-American to serve on the Supreme Court. He had a fierce will to change America, which led to clashes with Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcom X, and Robert F. Kennedy. Most surprising was Marshall’s secret and controversial relationship with the FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover. Based on eight years of research and interviews with over 150 sources, Thurgood Marshall is the sweeping and inspirational story of an enduring figure in American life who rose from the descendants of slaves to become an American hero. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equal Justice Under Law Harold Melvin Hyman, William M. Wiecek, 1982 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Law and the Company We Keep Aviam Soifer, 1995 The ability to step outside traditional doctrinal boxes that concentrate on relationships between individuals and government will help not only legal thinkers but every person to reason toward justice. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Charter Equality Rights , 2007 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Injustices Ian Millhiser, 2016-06-28 Now with a new epilogue-- an unprecedented and unwavering history of the Supreme Court showing how its decisions have consistently favored the moneyed and powerful. Few American institutions have inflicted greater suffering on ordinary people than the Supreme Court of the United States. Since its inception, the justices of the Supreme Court have shaped a nation where children toiled in coal mines, where Americans could be forced into camps because of their race, and where a woman could be sterilized against her will by state law. The Court was the midwife of Jim Crow, the right hand of union busters, and the dead hand of the Confederacy. Nor is the modern Court a vast improvement, with its incursions on voting rights and its willingness to place elections for sale. In this powerful indictment of a venerated institution, Ian Millhiser tells the history of the Supreme Court through the eyes of the everyday people who have suffered the most from it. America ratified three constitutional amendments to provide equal rights to freed slaves, but the justices spent thirty years largely dismantling these amendments. Then they spent the next forty years rewriting them into a shield for the wealthy and the powerful. In the Warren era and the few years following it, progressive justices restored the Constitution's promises of equality, free speech, and fair justice for the accused. But, Millhiser contends, that was an historic accident. Indeed, if it weren't for several unpredictable events, Brown v. Board of Education could have gone the other way. In Injustices, Millhiser argues that the Supreme Court has seized power for itself that rightfully belongs to the people's elected representatives, and has bent the arc of American history away from justice. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equal Justice Under Law Mary Ann Harrell, Federal Bar Association. Foundation, Foundation of the Federal Bar Association, Washington, 1975 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Letter from Birmingham Jail MARTIN LUTHER KING JR., Martin Luther King, 2018 This landmark missive from one of the greatest activists in history calls for direct, non-violent resistance in the fight against racism, and reflects on the healing power of love. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Constitutional Justice Trevor R. S. Allan, 2003 Scope of Judicial Review |
| equal justice under the law meaning: How Judges Think Richard A. Posner, 2010-05-01 A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning. However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs. In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion. Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term. In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists. Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based. It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic. Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning. Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication. More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: The Constitution in Conflict Robert A. Burt, 1992 In a remarkably innovative reconstruction of constitutional history, Robert Burt traces the controversy over judicial supremacy back to the founding fathers. Also drawing extensively on Lincoln's conception of political equality, Burt argues convincingly that judicial supremacy and majority rule are both inconsistent with the egalitarian democratic ideal. The first fully articulated presentation of the Constitution as a communally interpreted document in which the Supreme Court plays an important but not predominant role, The Constitution in Conflict has dramatic implications for both the theory and the practice of constitutional law. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: The Slaveholding Republic the late Don E. Fehrenbacher, 2002-12-19 Many leading historians have argued that the Constitution of the United States was a proslavery document. But in The Slaveholding Republic, one of America's most eminent historians refutes this claim in a landmark history that stretches from the Continental Congress to the Presidency of Abraham Lincoln. Fehrenbacher shows that the Constitution itself was more or less neutral on the issue of slavery and that, in the antebellum period, the idea that the Constitution protected slavery was hotly debated (many Northerners would concede only that slavery was protected by state law, not by federal law). Nevertheless, he also reveals that U.S. policy abroad and in the territories was consistently proslavery. Fehrenbacher makes clear why Lincoln's election was such a shock to the South and shows how Lincoln's approach to emancipation, which seems exceedingly cautious by modern standards, quickly evolved into a Republican revolution that ended the anomaly of the United States as a slaveholding republic. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Representing Justice Judith Resnik, Dennis Edward Curtis, 2011-01-01 A remnant of the Renaissance : the transnational iconography of justice -- Civic space, the public square, and good governance -- Obedience : the judge as the loyal servant of the state -- Of eyes and ostriches -- Why eyes? : color, blindness, and impartiality -- Representations and abstractions : identity, politics, and rights -- From seventeenth-century town halls to twentieth-century courts -- A building and litigation boom in Twentieth-Century federal courts -- Late Twentieth-Century United States courts : monumentality, security, and eclectic imagery -- Monuments to the present and museums of the past : national courts (and prisons) -- Constructing regional rights -- Multi-jurisdictional premises : from peace to crimes -- From rites to rights -- Courts : in and out of sight, site, and cite -- An iconography for democratic adjudication. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Communist Political Subversion, Part 1, 2 United States. Congress. House. Un-American Activities, 1957 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Equality and Discrimination Under International Law Warwick Alexander McKean, 1983 History of discrimination and equal opportunity under international law - discusses replacement of minority group protection by human rights; covers racial discrimination, sex discrimination, language discrimination and religious discrimination; examines role of UN and specialized agencies, role of ILO and ILO Conventions, judicial decisions, etc. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Federal Textbook on Citizenship United States. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1971 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Aboriginal Benchbook for Western Australian Courts Stephanie Fryer-Smith, 2002 The objectives of the Benchbook are twofold. First, it seeks to assist judicial officers in criminal proceedings involving Aboriginal persons. The second objective of the Benchbook is to serve as a Model or template for adaption and application in other Australian criminal jurisdictions. Sinece the Benchbook is very much an experimental work, such adaptations may well reflect different approaches and emphases. -introduction. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: United States Code United States, 2008 The United States Code is the official codification of the general and permanent laws of the United States of America. The Code was first published in 1926, and a new edition of the code has been published every six years since 1934. The 2012 edition of the Code incorporates laws enacted through the One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Second Session, the last of which was signed by the President on January 15, 2013. It does not include laws of the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, First Session, enacted between January 2, 2013, the date it convened, and January 15, 2013. By statutory authority this edition may be cited U.S.C. 2012 ed. As adopted in 1926, the Code established prima facie the general and permanent laws of the United States. The underlying statutes reprinted in the Code remained in effect and controlled over the Code in case of any discrepancy. In 1947, Congress began enacting individual titles of the Code into positive law. When a title is enacted into positive law, the underlying statutes are repealed and the title then becomes legal evidence of the law. Currently, 26 of the 51 titles in the Code have been so enacted. These are identified in the table of titles near the beginning of each volume. The Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives continues to prepare legislation pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 285b to enact the remainder of the Code, on a title-by-title basis, into positive law. The 2012 edition of the Code was prepared and published under the supervision of Ralph V. Seep, Law Revision Counsel. Grateful acknowledgment is made of the contributions by all who helped in this work, particularly the staffs of the Office of the Law Revision Counsel and the Government Printing Office--Preface. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Speaking of Equality P. Westen, 2014-07-14 Aristotle noted that equality is the plea not of those who are satisfied but of those who seek change, and the word has long been invoked in the name of social reform. It retains its force because arguments for equality put arguments for inequality on the defensive. But why is equality laudatory and inequality pejorative? In this first book-length analysis of the rhetorical force of equality arguments, Peter Westen argues that they derive their persuasiveness largely from the kind of word that equality is, rather than from the values it incorporates. By focusing on ordinary language and using commonplace examples from law and morals, Westen argues that equality is a single concept that lends itself to a multiplicity of conceptions by virtue of its capacity to incorporate diverse standards of comparison by reference. Equality arguments draw rhetorical force in part from their tendency to mask the standards of comparison on which they are based, and in so doing to confound fact with value, premises with conclusions, and uncontested with contested norms. Originally published in 1990. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Access to Justice as a Human Right Francesco Francioni, 2007-10-25 In international law, as in any other legal system, respect and protection of human rights can be guaranteed only by the availability of effective judicial remedies. When a right is violated or damage is caused, access to justice is of fundamental importance for the injured individual and it is an essential component of the rule of law. Yet, access to justice as a human right remains problematic in international law. First, because individual access to international justice remains exceptional and based on specific treaty arrangements, rather than on general principles of international law; second, because even when such right is guaranteed as a matter of treaty obligation, other norms or doctrines of international law may effectively impede its exercise, as in the case of sovereign immunity or non reviewability of UN Security Council measures directly affecting individuals. Further, even access to domestic legal remedies is suffering because of the constraints put by security threats, such as terrorism, on the full protection of freedom and human rights. This collection of essays offers seven distinct perspectives on the present status of access to justice: its development in customary international law, the stress put on it in times of emergency, its problematic exercise in the case of violations of the law of war, its application to torture victims, its development in the case law of the UN Human Rights Committee and of the European Court of Human Rights, its application to the emerging field of environmental justice, and finally access to justice as part of fundamental rights in European law. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Hearings United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1957 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: Hearing[s] Before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-fourth Congress, First-second Sessions United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1955 |
| equal justice under the law meaning: The Anthropology of Law Fernanda Pirie, 2013-10-31 Questions about the nature of law, its relationship with custom, and the form of legal rules, categories and claims, are placed at the centre of this challenging, yet accessible, introduction. Anthropology of law is presented as a distinctive subject within the broader field of legal anthropology, suggesting new avenues of inquiry for the anthropologist, while also bringing empirical studies within the ambit of legal scholarship. The Anthropology of Law considers contemporary debates on human rights, international laws, and new forms of property alongside ethnographic studies of order and conflict resolution. It also delves into the rich corpus of texts and codes studied by legal historians, classicists and orientalists: the great legal systems of ancient China, India, and the Islamic world, unjustly neglected by anthropologists, are examined alongside forms of law created on their peripheries. Ancient codes, medieval coutumes, village constitutions, and tribal laws provide rich empirical detail for the authors analysis of the cross-cultural importance of the form of law, as text or rule, and carefully-selected examples shed new light upon the interrelations and distinctions between laws, custom, and justice. Legalism is taken as the starting point for inquiry into the nature and functions of law, and its roles as an instrument of government, a subject of scholarship, and an assertion of moral order. An argument unfolds concerning the tensions between legalistic thought and argument, and the ideological or aspirational claims to embody justice, morality, and religious truth, which lie at the heart of what we think of as law. |
| equal justice under the law meaning: The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 , |
EQUAL Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Jun 14, 2012 · The meaning of EQUAL is of the same measure, quantity, amount, or number as another. How to use equal in a sentence. Synonym Discussion of Equal.
Equal Symbol (=)
The equals symbol or equal sign is used in mathematics to assert that two expressions have the same value. It is also used in boolean logic as an operator, evaluating true or false based on …
Equal® Zero Calorie Sweetener & Sugar Substitutes
Equal is the sweetener substitute you trust to perfectly flavor your favorite beverages without the calories. Visit Equal.com to learn more!
EQUAL | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
EQUAL definition: 1. the same in amount, number, or size: 2. the same in importance and deserving the same…. Learn more.
Equal, Less and Greater Than Symbols - Math is Fun
As well as the familiar equals sign (=) it is also very useful to show if something is not equal to (≠) greater than (〉) or less than (〈).
Equal - definition of equal by The Free Dictionary
a person or thing equal to another, esp in merit, ability, etc: he has no equal when it comes to boxing.
equal - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
May 27, 2025 · Adjective [edit] equal (not generally comparable, comparative more equal, superlative most equal) (not comparable) The same in all respects. Synonyms: identical, on a …
What does equal mean? - Definitions.net
Equal typically refers to something being the same in quantity, size, degree, value, or status. It suggests a balance or equivalence between two or more things.
Equal to Sign - BYJU'S
In mathematics, the equal sign (=) describes equality between the values, equations, or expressions written on both sides. What does ≡ mean in math? Equal sign with three lines, i.e. …
Equal Symbol (=): Unlock its Meaning, Uses and Examples
The equal symbol, denoted as “=,” is a fundamental mathematical symbol representing equality between two expressions. Its meaning is straightforward yet profoundly crucial in mathematics, …
EQUAL Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Jun 14, 2012 · The meaning of EQUAL is of the same measure, quantity, amount, or number as another. How to use equal in a sentence. Synonym Discussion of Equal.
Equal Symbol (=)
The equals symbol or equal sign is used in mathematics to assert that two expressions have the same value. It is also used in boolean logic as an operator, evaluating true or false based on …
Equal® Zero Calorie Sweetener & Sugar Substitutes
Equal is the sweetener substitute you trust to perfectly flavor your favorite beverages without the calories. Visit Equal.com to learn more!
EQUAL | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
EQUAL definition: 1. the same in amount, number, or size: 2. the same in importance and deserving the same…. Learn more.
Equal, Less and Greater Than Symbols - Math is Fun
As well as the familiar equals sign (=) it is also very useful to show if something is not equal to (≠) greater than (〉) or less than (〈).
Equal - definition of equal by The Free Dictionary
a person or thing equal to another, esp in merit, ability, etc: he has no equal when it comes to boxing.
equal - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
May 27, 2025 · Adjective [edit] equal (not generally comparable, comparative more equal, superlative most equal) (not comparable) The same in all respects. Synonyms: identical, on a …
What does equal mean? - Definitions.net
Equal typically refers to something being the same in quantity, size, degree, value, or status. It suggests a balance or equivalence between two or more things.
Equal to Sign - BYJU'S
In mathematics, the equal sign (=) describes equality between the values, equations, or expressions written on both sides. What does ≡ mean in math? Equal sign with three lines, i.e. …
Equal Symbol (=): Unlock its Meaning, Uses and Examples
The equal symbol, denoted as “=,” is a fundamental mathematical symbol representing equality between two expressions. Its meaning is straightforward yet profoundly crucial in mathematics, …
