Advertisement
| deleuze difference: Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition James Williams, 2013-01-31 A new edition of this introduction to Deleuze's seminal work, Difference and Repetition, with new material on intensity, science and action and new engagements with Bryant, Sauvagnargues, Smith, Somers-Hall and de Beistegui. |
| deleuze difference: Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition James Williams, 2013-01-15 A revised, expanded and fully up-to-date critical introduction to Deleuze's most important work of philosophyBy critically analysing Deleuze's methods, principles and arguments, James Williams helps readers to engage with the revolutionary core of Deleuze's philosophy and take up positions for or against its most innovative and controversial ideas. |
| deleuze difference: Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition James Williams, 2008 This is the first critical introduction to Difference and Repetition, Gilles Deleuze s most important work of philosophy and one of the most significant texts of contemporary philosophy. In offering a critical analysis of Deleuze s methods, principles and arguments, the book enables readers to engage with the revolutionary core of Deleuze s philosophy and take up favourable or critical positions with respect to its most innovative and controversial ideas. The book will also help to extend Deleuze s work to philosophers working in the analytic tradition. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and Philosophy Keith Ansell-Pearson, Keith Ansell Pearson, 2002-03-11 The work of Gilles Deleuze has had an impact far beyond philosophy. He is among Foucault and Derrida as one of the most cited of all contemporary French thinkers. Never a student 'of' philosophy, Deleuze was always philosophical and many influential poststructuralist and postmodernist texts can be traced to his celebrated resurrection of Nietzsche against Hegel in his Nietzsche and Philosophy, from which this collection draws its title. This searching new collection considers Deleuze's relation to the philosophical tradition and beyond to the future of philosophy, science and technology. In addition to considering Deleuze's imaginative readings of classic figures such as Spinoza and Kant, the essays also point to the meaning of Deleuze on 'monstrous' and machinic thinking, on philosophy and engineering, on philosophy and biology, on modern painting and literature. Deleuze and Philosophy continues the spirit of experimentation and invention that features in Deleuze's work and will appeal to those studying across philosophy, social theory, literature and cultural studies who themselves are seeking new paradigms of thought. |
| deleuze difference: Reconsidering Difference Todd May, 1997-04-15 French philosophy since World War II has been preoccupied with the issue of difference. Specifically, it has wanted to promote or to leave room for ways of living and of being that differ from those usually seen in contemporary Western society. Given the experience of the Holocaust, the motivation for such a preoccupation is not difficult to see. For some thinkers, especially Jean-Luc Nancy, Jacques Derrida, Emmanuel Levinas, and Gilles Deleuze, this preoccupation has led to a mode of philosophizing that privileges difference as a philosophical category. Nancy privileges difference as a mode of conceiving community, Derrida as a mode of conceiving linguistic meaning, Levinas as a mode of conceiving ethics, and Deleuze as a mode of conceiving ontology. Reconsidering Difference has a twofold task, the primary one critical and the secondary one reconstructive. The critical task is to show that these various privilegings are philosophical failures. They wind up, for reasons unique to each position, endorsing positions that are either incoherent or implausible. Todd May considers the incoherencies of each position and offers an alternative approach. His reconstructive task, which he calls contingent holism, takes the phenomena under investigation—community, language, ethics, and ontology—and sketches a way of reconceiving them that preserves the motivations of the rejected positions without falling into the problems that beset them. |
| deleuze difference: Difference and Repetition Gilles Deleuze, 1994 Difference and Repetition, a brilliant exposition of the critique of identity, has come to be considered a contemporary classic in philosophy and one of Deleuze's most original works. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze's 'Difference and Repetition' Joe Hughes, 2009-04-12 A Reader's Guide to arguably Deleuze's most demanding work and a key text in modern European thought. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and Derrida Vernon W. Cisney, 2018-11-27 Examines independent documentary film production in India within a political context. |
| deleuze difference: Germinal Life Keith Ansell-Pearson, Keith Ansell Pearson, 2012-10-12 Germinal Life is the sequel to the highly successful Viroid Life. Where Viroid Life provided a compelling reading of Nietzsche's philosophy of the human, Germinal Life is an original and groundbreaking analysis of little known and difficult theoretical aspects of the work of French philosopher Gilles Deleuze. In particular, Keith Ansell Pearson provides fresh and insightful readings of Deleuze's work on Bergson and Deleuze's most famous texts Difference and Repetition and A Thousand Plateaus. Germinal Life also provides new insights into Deleuze's relation to some of the most original thinkers of modernity, from Darwin to Freud and Nietzsche, and explores the connections between Deleuze and more recent thinkers such as Adorno and Merleau-Ponty. |
| deleuze difference: Gilles Deleuze Todd May, 2005-01-10 This book offers a readable and compelling introduction to the work of one of the twentieth century's most important and elusive thinkers. Other books have tried to explain Deleuze in general terms. Todd May organizes his book around a central question at the heart of Deleuze's philosophy: how might we live? The author then goes on to explain how Deleuze offers a view of the cosmos as a living thing that provides ways of conducting our lives that we may not have dreamed of. Through this approach the full range of Deleuze's philosophy is covered. Offering a lucid account of a highly technical philosophy, Todd May's introduction will be widely read amongst those in philosophy, political science, cultural studies and French studies. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and Philosophy Keith Ansell-Pearson, Keith Ansell Pearson, 2002-03-11 The work of Gilles Deleuze has had an impact far beyond philosophy. He is among Foucault and Derrida as one of the most cited of all contemporary French thinkers. Never a student 'of' philosophy, Deleuze was always philosophical and many influential poststructuralist and postmodernist texts can be traced to his celebrated resurrection of Nietzsche against Hegel in his Nietzsche and Philosophy, from which this collection draws its title. This searching new collection considers Deleuze's relation to the philosophical tradition and beyond to the future of philosophy, science and technology. In addition to considering Deleuze's imaginative readings of classic figures such as Spinoza and Kant, the essays also point to the meaning of Deleuze on 'monstrous' and machinic thinking, on philosophy and engineering, on philosophy and biology, on modern painting and literature. Deleuze and Philosophy continues the spirit of experimentation and invention that features in Deleuze's work and will appeal to those studying across philosophy, social theory, literature and cultural studies who themselves are seeking new paradigms of thought. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze's 'Difference and Repetition' Joe Hughes, 2009-02-12 Gilles Deleuze is without question one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century. Difference and Repetition is a classic work of contemporary philosophy and a key text in Deleuze's oeuvre, a brilliant exposition of the critique of identity that develops two key concepts: pure difference and complex repetition. Deleuze's 'Difference and Repetition': A Reader's Guide offers a concise and accessible introduction to this hugely important and yet notoriously demanding work. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze's Difference and Repetition Henry Somers-Hall, 2013-03-01 The essential toolkit for anyone approaching Deleuze for the first time. When students read Difference and Repetition for the first time, they face two main hurdles: the wide range of sources that Deleuze draws upon and his dense writing style. This Edinburgh Philosophical Guide helps students to negotiate these hurdles, taking them through the text paragraphy by paragraph. It situates Deleuze within Continental philosophy more broadly and explains why he develops his philosophy in his unique way. If you're a seasoned Deleuzian, there's something here for you too: you won't want to miss Henry Somers-Hall's new, positive interpretation of Difference and Repetition. |
| deleuze difference: Exploring Deleuze's Philosophy of Difference David Bright, 2020-02-06 The concept of difference occupies a central place in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. In this work, David Bright explores how Deleuze’s difference can be put to work in critical qualitative research. The book explores research and writing as a creative process of dynamically pursuing problems. Following Deleuze’s advice not to think of problems in terms of solutions, the book offers important methodological insights into the ways the subjects, objects, and processes of research might be conceived and represented in writing, exploring the problem of thinking and writing about difference in complex ways without reducing thought to static representations of identity. Bright uses the example of foreign teachers and international schooling in Vietnam to show us how Deleuze’s difference can be used in critical qualitative research, demonstrating the limits of traditional ways of thinking about difference in learning and teaching. Exploring Deleuze's Philosophy of Difference is a book that will interest all those with an interest in the application of Deleuze’s philosophy to critical qualitative research. Perfect for courses such as: Critical Qualitative Research | Qualitative Inquiry | Post-qualitative Inquiry | Deleuze | Difference | Identity | Ethnography | English Language Teaching | International Education | Writing as a Method of Inquiry |
| deleuze difference: Eros and Economy Barbara Jenkins, 2016-07-01 Eros and Economy: Jung, Deleuze, Sexual Difference explores the possibility that social relations between things, partially inscribed in their aesthetics, offer important insights into collective political-economic relations of domination and desire. Drawing on the analytical psychology of Carl Jung and the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze, this book focuses on the idea that desire or libido, overlaid by sexual difference, is a driving force behind the material manifestations of cultural production in practices as diverse as art or economy. Re-reading the history of capitalism and aesthetics with an awareness of the forces of sexual difference reveals not just their integral role in the development of capitalist markets, but a new understanding of our political-economic relations as humans. The appearance of the energies of sexual difference is highlighted in a number of different historical periods and political economies, from the Rococo period of pre-revolutionary France, to the aesthetics and economics of Keynesian Bloomsbury, to our contemporary Postmodern sensibility. With these examples, Jenkins demonstrates that the very constitution of capitalist markets is affected by the interaction of these forces; and she argues that a conscious appreciation and negotiation of them is integral to an immanent, democratic understanding of power. With its unique application of Jungian theory, this book provides important new insights into debates surrounding art, aesthetics, and identity politics, as well as into the quest for autonomous, democratic institutions of politics and economics. As such, this book will appeal to researchers, academics and postgraduate students in the fields of Jung, psychoanalysis, political economy, cultural studies and gender studies, as well as those interested in the field of cultural economy. |
| deleuze difference: Difference and Givenness Levi R. Bryant, 2008-04-02 From one end of his philosophical work to the other, Gilles Deleuze consistently described his position as a transcendental empiricism. But just what is transcendental about Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism? And how does his position fit with the traditional empiricism articulated by Hume? In Difference and Givenness, Levi Bryant addresses these long-neglected questions so critical to an understanding of Deleuze’s thinking. Through a close examination of Deleuze’s independent work--focusing especially on Difference and Repetition--as well as his engagement with thinkers such as Kant, Maïmon, Bergson, and Simondon, Bryant sets out to unearth Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism and to show how it differs from transcendental idealism, absolute idealism, and traditional empiricism. What emerges from these efforts is a metaphysics that strives to articulate the conditions for real existence, capable of accounting for the individual itself without falling into conceptual or essentialist abstraction. In Bryant’s analysis, Deleuze’s metaphysics articulates an account of being as process or creative individuation based on difference, as well as a challenging critique--and explanation--of essentialist substance ontologies. A clear and powerful discussion of how Deleuze’s project relates to two of the most influential strains in the history of philosophy, this book will prove essential to anyone seeking to understand Deleuze’s thought and its specific contribution to metaphysics and epistemology. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze's Difference and Repetition Henry Somers-Hall, 2013 A step-by-step guide to Deleuze's Difference and Repetition that helps students to negotiate Deleuze's vast range of sources and difficult, dense language. It is an essential toolkit for anyone approaching Deleuze for the first time. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and Theology Christopher Ben Simpson, 2012-11-22 An exploration of the thought of Gilles Deleuze and its relevance to theology. |
| deleuze difference: Gilles Deleuze and Metaphysics Alain Beaulieu, Edward Kazarian, Julia Sushytska, 2014-12-24 Deleuze remains indifferent to the ambient pathos related to the end of metaphysics and compares the undertakings of destruction, overcoming and deconstruction of metaphysics with the gestures of murderers. He considers himself “a pure metaphysician,” which is rather unique in the contemporary philosophical landscape. What are we to make of this and similar claims? What do they mean in light of the effort made during the last several centuries to overcome, overturn, destroy, or deconstruct metaphysics? If we consider Deleuze’s work more closely, might find him engaging in the kind of thinking that is commonly referred to as metaphysical? And if Deleuze is indeed a metaphysician, does this undercut the many insightful contributions of the twentieth century philosophers who dedicate their thought to bringing down Western metaphysical tradition? Or does it suggest that there is a sense of metaphysics that should nevertheless be preserved? These and similar questions are addressed in this volume by a series of international scholars. The goal of the book is to critically engage an aspect of Deleuze’s thought that, for the most part, has been neglected, and to understand better his “immanent metaphysics.” It also seeks to explore the consequences of such an engagement. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and the Genesis of Representation Joe Hughes, 2008-10-19 Makes an original and important contribution to Deleuze studies. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and the History of Mathematics Simon Duffy, 2013-05-09 Gilles Deleuze's engagements with mathematics, replete in his work, rely upon the construction of alternative lineages in the history of mathematics, which challenge some of the self imposed limits that regulate the canonical concepts of the discipline. For Deleuze, these challenges provide an opportunity to reconfigure particular philosophical problems - for example, the problem of individuation - and to develop new concepts in response to them. The highly original research presented in this book explores the mathematical construction of Deleuze's philosophy, as well as addressing the undervalued and often neglected question of the mathematical thinkers who influenced his work. In the wake of Alain Badiou's recent and seemingly devastating attack on the way the relation between mathematics and philosophy is configured in Deleuze's work, Simon B.Duffy offers a robust defence of the structure of Deleuze's philosophy and, in particular, the adequacy of the mathematical problems used in its construction. By reconciling Badiou and Deleuze's seemingly incompatible engagements with mathematics, Duffy succeeds in presenting a solid foundation for Deleuze's philosophy, rebuffing the recent challenges against it. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze's Bergsonism Craig Lundy, 2018-10-31 The life stories of more than 1,000 women who shaped Scotland's history |
| deleuze difference: Actological Readings in Continental Philosophy Malcolm Torry, 2023-01-12 Actological Readings in Continental Philosophy is what it says it is. The book asks how we might understand the writings of a number of continental philosophers actologically: that is, with reality understood as action in changing patterns rather than as beings that change. It also asks how the different continental philosophies might enable us to develop an actology: an understanding of reality as action in changing patterns. The philosophers whom we study are Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche, Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Emmanuel Levinas, Gilles Deleuze, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Gaston Bachelard, Michel Foucault, and Michel Serres. A whole new way of understanding reality casts new light on their philosophies and raises and answers some significant new questions. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and Philosophy Constantin V. Boundas, 2006-07-18 Deleuze and Philosophy provides an exploration of the continuing philosophical relevance of Gilles Deleuze. This collection of essays uses Deleuze to move between thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle, Husserl, Hume, Locke, Kant, Foucault, Badiou and Agamben. As such the reader is left with a comprehensive understanding not just of the philosophy of Deleuze but how he can be situated within a much broader philosophical trajectory. Constantin Boundas has gathered together recent scholarship on Deleuze's philosophy by an acclaimed line-up of international contributors, all of whom seek to provide new and previously unexplored theoretical terrains that will be of interest to both the Deleuze specialist and student alike. Three of the essays are by key French Deleuzians whose work is not widely available in translation. This enticing collection is essential reading for anyone interested not just in Deleuze but in the history of philosophical ideas. Contributors include: Zsuzsa Baross, Veronique Bergen, Ronald Bogue, Bruce Baugh, Rosi Braidotti, Claire Colebrook, Bela Egyed, Philippe Mengue, Dorothea Olkowski, Davide Panagia, Daniel W. Smith, Jeremie Valentin, Arnaud Villani. |
| deleuze difference: Political Theory on Death and Dying Erin A. Dolgoy, Kimberly Hurd Hale, Bruce Peabody, 2021-09-14 Political Theory on Death and Dying provides a comprehensive, encyclopedic review that compiles and curates the latest scholarship, research, and debates on the political and social implications of death and dying. Adopting an easy-to-follow chronological and multi-disciplinary approach on 45 canonical figures and thinkers, leading scholars from a diverse range of fields, including political science, philosophy, and English, discuss each thinker’s ethical and philosophical accounts on mortality and death. Each chapter focuses on a single established figure in political philosophy, as well as religious and literary thinkers, covering classical to contemporary thought on death. Through this approach, the chapters are designed to stand alone, allowing the reader to study every entry in isolation and with greater depth, as well as trace how thinkers are influenced by their predecessors. A key contribution to the field, Political Theory on Death and Dying provides an excellent overview for students and researchers who study philosophy of death, the history of political thought, and political philosophy. |
| deleuze difference: Hegel and Deleuze Karen Houle, Jim Vernon, 2013-06-30 Hegel and Deleuze cannily examines the various resonances and dissonances between these two major philosophers. The collection represents the best in contemporary international scholarship on G. W. F. Hegel and Gilles Deleuze, and the contributing authors inhabit the as-yet uncharted space between the two thinkers, collectively addressing most of the major tensions and resonances between their ideas and laying a solid ground for future scholarship. The essays are organized thematically into two groups: those that maintain a firm but nuanced disjunction or opposition between Hegel and Deleuze, and those that chart possible connections, syntheses, or both. As is clear from this range of texts, the challenges involved in grasping, appraising, appropriating, and developing the systems of Deleuze and Hegel are varied and immense. While neither Hegel nor Deleuze gets the last word, the contributors ably demonstrate that partisans of either can no longer ignore the voice of the other. |
| deleuze difference: Badiou's Deleuze Jon Roffe, 2014-09-11 Badiou's Deleuze presents the first thorough analysis of one of the most significant encounters in contemporary thought: Alain Badiou's summary interpretation and rejection of the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Badiou's reading of Deleuze is largely laid out in his provocative book, Deleuze: The Clamor of Being, a highly influential work of considerable power. Badiou's Deleuze presents a detailed examination of Badiou's reading and argues that, whilst it fails to do justice to the Deleuzean project, it invites us to reconsider what Deleuze's philosophy amounts to, to reassess Deleuze's power to address the ultimate concerns of philosophy. Badiou's Deleuze analyses the differing metaphysics of two of the most influential of recent continental philosophers, whose divergent views have helped to shape much contemporary thought. |
| deleuze difference: Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos Jeffrey A. Bell, 2006-01-01 From the early 1960s until his death, French philosopher Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) wrote many influential works on philosophy, literature, film, and fine art. One of Deleuze's main philosophical projects was a systematic inversion of the traditional relationship between identity and difference. This Deleuzian philosophy of difference is the subject of Jeffrey A. Bell's Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos. Bell argues that Deleuze's efforts to develop a philosophy of difference are best understood by exploring both Deleuze's claim to be a Spinozist, and Nietzsche's claim to have found in Spinoza an important precursor. Beginning with an analysis of these claims, Bell shows how Deleuze extends and transforms concepts at work in Spinoza and Nietzsche to produce a philosophy of difference that promotes and, in fact, exemplifies the notions of dynamic systems and complexity theory. With these concepts at work, Deleuze constructs a philosophical approach that avoids many of the difficulties that linger in other attempts to think about difference. Bell uses close readings of Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Derrida, and Whitehead to illustrate how Deleuze's philosophy is successful in this regard and to demonstrate the importance of the historical tradition for Deleuze. Far from being a philosopher who turns his back on what is taken to be a mistaken metaphysical tradition, Bell argues that Deleuze is best understood as a thinker who endeavoured to continue the work of traditional metaphysics and philosophy. |
| deleuze difference: Lacan and Deleuze Bostjan Nedoh, 2016-10-26 It is often said that Lacan is the most radical representative of structuralism, a thinker of negativity and alienation, whereas Deleuze is pictured as a great opponent of the structuralist project, a vitalist and a thinker of creative potentialities of desire. It seems the two cannot be further apart. This volume of 12 new essays breaks the myth of their foreignness (if not hostility) and places the two in a productive conversation. By taking on topics such as baroque, perversion, death drive, ontology/topology, face, linguistics and formalism the essays highlight key entry points for a discussion between Lacan's and Deleuze's respective thoughts. The proposed lines of investigation do not argue for a simple equation of their thoughts, but for a 'disjunctive synthesis', which acknowledges their differences, while insisting on their positive and mutually informed reading. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze and the Body Laura Guillaume, 2011-03-22 This book will be important reading for those with an interest in Deleuze, but also in performance arts, film, and contemporary culture. |
| deleuze difference: Deleuze's Difference and Repetition Joe Hughes, 2009 |
| deleuze difference: Thinking Between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty Judith Wambacq, 2017 Questioning the dominant view that Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty have little of substance in common, Judith Wambacq draws on unpublished primary sources and current scholarship in English and French to bring them into a compelling dialogue to reveal a shared concern with the transcendental conditions of thought. |
| deleuze difference: Signature of the World Eric Alliez, 2004-12-30 This text focuses on one of the most influential works of contemporary philosophy: 'What is Philosophy?' by Deleuze and Guattari. Alliez sets 'What is Philosophy?' in the context of earlier work by the two theorists and the work of both analytic philosophers and continental phenomenologists. |
| deleuze difference: Ontology in Heidegger and Deleuze G. Rae, 2014-05-07 The first book in English to offer an extended comparative analysis of Heidegger and Deleuze. Those familiar with Heidegger's and Deleuze's thinking will find a detailed, well-researched book that comes to an innovative conclusion, while those new to both will find a clear, well-written exposition of their key concepts. |
| deleuze difference: Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos Jeffrey A. Bell, 2006-12-15 From the early 1960s until his death, French philosopher Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) wrote many influential works on philosophy, literature, film, and fine art. One of Deleuze's main philosophical projects was a systematic inversion of the traditional relationship between identity and difference. This Deleuzian philosophy of difference is the subject of Jeffrey A. Bell's Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos. Bell argues that Deleuze's efforts to develop a philosophy of difference are best understood by exploring both Deleuze's claim to be a Spinozist, and Nietzsche's claim to have found in Spinoza an important precursor. Beginning with an analysis of these claims, Bell shows how Deleuze extends and transforms concepts at work in Spinoza and Nietzsche to produce a philosophy of difference that promotes and, in fact, exemplifies the notions of dynamic systems and complexity theory. With these concepts at work, Deleuze constructs a philosophical approach that avoids many of the difficulties that linger in other attempts to think about difference. Bell uses close readings of Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Derrida, and Whitehead to illustrate how Deleuze's philosophy is successful in this regard and to demonstrate the importance of the historical tradition for Deleuze. Far from being a philosopher who turns his back on what is taken to be a mistaken metaphysical tradition, Bell argues that Deleuze is best understood as a thinker who endeavoured to continue the work of traditional metaphysics and philosophy. |
| deleuze difference: EPZ Thousand Plateaus Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, 2004-09-01 ‘A rare and remarkable book.' Times Literary Supplement Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) was Professor of Philosophy at the University of Paris VIII. He is a key figure in poststructuralism, and one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. Félix Guattari (1930-1992) was a psychoanalyst at the la Borde Clinic, as well as being a major social theorist and radical activist. A Thousand Plateaus is part of Deleuze and Guattari's landmark philosophical project, Capitalism and Schizophrenia - a project that still sets the terms of contemporary philosophical debate. A Thousand Plateaus provides a compelling analysis of social phenomena and offers fresh alternatives for thinking about philosophy and culture. Its radical perspective provides a toolbox for ‘nomadic thought' and has had a galvanizing influence on today's anti-capitalist movement. Translated by Brian Massumi> |
| deleuze difference: Gilles Deleuze's Transcendental Empiricism , 2016-09-20 Deleuze's readings of Hume, Spinoza, Bergson and Nietzsche respond to philosophical critiques of classical and modern empiricism. However, Deleuze's arguments against those critiques - by Kant, Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger - consolidate the philosophy of immanence that can be called 'transcendental empiricism'. Marc Rolli offers us a detailed examination of Gilles Deleuze's philosophy of transcendental empiricism. He demonstrates that Deleuze takes up and radicalises the empiricist school of thought developing a systematic alternative to the mainstreams of modern continental philosophy. |
| deleuze difference: Magical Realism and Deleuze Eva Aldea, 2011-02-10 > |
Gilles Deleuze Difference and Repetition - preterhuman.net
We wish to indicate the difference between this type of artificial blockage and alled a natural blockage of the concept. One refers to logic pure and simple, but the other refers to a transcen
Difference and Repetition PDF - cdn.bookey.app
In "Difference and Repetition," Gilles Deleuze embarks on a pioneering philosophical exploration that challenges the conventional frameworks of identity and representation, urging readers to …
WILLIAMS DIFFERENCE PRINT.indd - Edinburgh University Press
Deleuze constructs an association of trans-forming events, novelty and free-play as the primary form of exist-ence. All is revolutionary becoming. Revolution moves beyond the dichotomies of …
Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition
Deleuze here outlines two ways in which we might understand difference. The first is that difference is imposed on the world, the second is that difference emerges of its own accord, or …
Microsoft Word - DR complete outline.doc - umb.edu
After an analysis of morally motivated philosophic barriers to thinking difference and repetition--representation and the negative--Deleuze articulates the heart of the matter in Chapters 4 and …
Lecture 17: Deleuze and the Calculus - Henry Somers-Hall
In this lecture, I just want to give a basic account of Deleuze’s use of the differential calculus in chapter four of Difference and Repetition. As we’ll see next week, the calculus provides a …
Deleuze Difference And Repetition - perseus
gilles deleuze is without question one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century difference and repetition is a classic work of contemporary philosophy and a key text in …
9780826426963.pdf
What does Deleuze mean by the object? This question struc-tured ‘The Method of Dramatization’, a 1968 talk which shares much of its content with the last two chapters of Difference and …
What Difference does Deleuze's Difference Make? - University …
tical formulas, devoid of physical embodiments. Deleuze articulates the structure of temporality required by his ontology of processes through an ingenious re-reading of Bergson's duree that …
An index for Difference and Repetition
This (non-exhaustive) index is intended to help thinkers map their way when delving in the rhizomatic strands of Gilles Deleuze’s thinking about difference and repetition by highlighting …
Deleuze and Derrida: Difference and the Power of the Negative
Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze are best known for their respective atempts to theoretically formulate non-dialectical conceptions of diference. Now, for the first time, Vernon W. Cisney …
Difference And Repetition Gilles Deleuze (PDF)
Meta-description: Dive deep into Gilles Deleuze's seminal work, Difference and Repetition. We unpack its core concepts, offering practical applications and addressing common …
Difference And Repetition Gilles Deleuze (book)
Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition (1968) isn't your average beach read. This dense, challenging, and profoundly rewarding text sits at the heart of Deleuze's philosophical project, …
Difference and Repetition
Difference and Repetition is a work of prodigious conceptual invention in which Deleuze draws upon his earlier readings of Plato, Hume, Bergson, Nietzsche and Kant, as well as elements of …
Gilles Deleuze Difference and Repetition
With Aristotle, Philosophy was able to provide itself with an organic representation of difference, with Leibniz and Hegel an orgiastic representation: it has not, for all that, reached difference in …
Identity in Deleuze’s Differential Ontolo - Springer
stones of Deleuze’s differ-ential ontology. Besides Difference and Repetition and his writings on Bergson, Deleuze employs it in ‘The Method of Dramatization’ (MD: 101, 110), ‘How do we …
The temporalization of difference: Reflections on Deleuze's ...
The paper argues that this temporalization of difference represents a permanent feature of Deleuze’s philosophy-one particularly visible in his highly influential book on Nietzsche – and …
Parsa - LaDeleuziana
In this reading, intensive difference is what Deleuze takes from subjectivity and applies to external reality. Instead, Meillassoux maintains a sharp, Cartesian distinction, between thinking subject …
Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and its implications for ALL …
The paper first explores Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and his ideas on language and learning, then discusses the implications of these ideas for ALL practice, including the …
Deleuze on Being as Becoming: Multiplicity, Difference, and
Deleuze on Being as Becoming: Multiplicity, Difference, and Virtuality ology and, by extension, end-of-metaphysics (hence philosophy) thesis. While Deleuze’s ontology revolves around …
Gilles Deleuze Difference and Repetition - preterhuman.net
We wish to indicate the difference between this type of artificial blockage and alled a natural blockage of the concept. One refers to logic pure and simple, but the other refers to a transcen
Difference and Repetition PDF - cdn.bookey.app
In "Difference and Repetition," Gilles Deleuze embarks on a pioneering philosophical exploration that challenges the conventional frameworks of identity and representation, urging readers to …
WILLIAMS DIFFERENCE PRINT.indd - Edinburgh University Press
Deleuze constructs an association of trans-forming events, novelty and free-play as the primary form of exist-ence. All is revolutionary becoming. Revolution moves beyond the dichotomies of …
Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition
Deleuze here outlines two ways in which we might understand difference. The first is that difference is imposed on the world, the second is that difference emerges of its own accord, or …
Microsoft Word - DR complete outline.doc - umb.edu
After an analysis of morally motivated philosophic barriers to thinking difference and repetition--representation and the negative--Deleuze articulates the heart of the matter in Chapters 4 and …
Lecture 17: Deleuze and the Calculus - Henry Somers-Hall
In this lecture, I just want to give a basic account of Deleuze’s use of the differential calculus in chapter four of Difference and Repetition. As we’ll see next week, the calculus provides a …
Deleuze Difference And Repetition - perseus
gilles deleuze is without question one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century difference and repetition is a classic work of contemporary philosophy and a key text in …
9780826426963.pdf
What does Deleuze mean by the object? This question struc-tured ‘The Method of Dramatization’, a 1968 talk which shares much of its content with the last two chapters of Difference and …
What Difference does Deleuze's Difference Make?
tical formulas, devoid of physical embodiments. Deleuze articulates the structure of temporality required by his ontology of processes through an ingenious re-reading of Bergson's duree that …
An index for Difference and Repetition
This (non-exhaustive) index is intended to help thinkers map their way when delving in the rhizomatic strands of Gilles Deleuze’s thinking about difference and repetition by highlighting …
Deleuze and Derrida: Difference and the Power of the …
Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze are best known for their respective atempts to theoretically formulate non-dialectical conceptions of diference. Now, for the first time, Vernon W. Cisney …
Difference And Repetition Gilles Deleuze (PDF)
Meta-description: Dive deep into Gilles Deleuze's seminal work, Difference and Repetition. We unpack its core concepts, offering practical applications and addressing common …
Difference And Repetition Gilles Deleuze (book)
Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition (1968) isn't your average beach read. This dense, challenging, and profoundly rewarding text sits at the heart of Deleuze's philosophical project, …
Difference and Repetition
Difference and Repetition is a work of prodigious conceptual invention in which Deleuze draws upon his earlier readings of Plato, Hume, Bergson, Nietzsche and Kant, as well as elements of …
Gilles Deleuze Difference and Repetition
With Aristotle, Philosophy was able to provide itself with an organic representation of difference, with Leibniz and Hegel an orgiastic representation: it has not, for all that, reached difference in …
Identity in Deleuze’s Differential Ontolo - Springer
stones of Deleuze’s differ-ential ontology. Besides Difference and Repetition and his writings on Bergson, Deleuze employs it in ‘The Method of Dramatization’ (MD: 101, 110), ‘How do we …
The temporalization of difference: Reflections on Deleuze's ...
The paper argues that this temporalization of difference represents a permanent feature of Deleuze’s philosophy-one particularly visible in his highly influential book on Nietzsche – and …
Parsa - LaDeleuziana
In this reading, intensive difference is what Deleuze takes from subjectivity and applies to external reality. Instead, Meillassoux maintains a sharp, Cartesian distinction, between thinking subject …
Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and its implications for …
The paper first explores Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and his ideas on language and learning, then discusses the implications of these ideas for ALL practice, including the …
Deleuze on Being as Becoming: Multiplicity, Difference, and …
Deleuze on Being as Becoming: Multiplicity, Difference, and Virtuality ology and, by extension, end-of-metaphysics (hence philosophy) thesis. While Deleuze’s ontology revolves around …
