Advertisement
| being and some philosophers: Being and Some Philosophers Étienne Gilson, 1952 The study of being was one of the main preoccupations of Etienne Gilson's scholarly and intellectual life. Being and Some Philosophers is at once a testament to the persistence of those concerns and an important landmark in the history of the question of being. The book charts the ways in which being is translated across history, from unity in Plato and substance in Aristotle to essence in Avicenna and the act of existence in Aquinas. It examines the vicissitudes of essence and existence in Suarez and Christian Wolff, in Hegel and Kierkegaard, in order to uncover the metaphysical and existential foundations of modern thought. And yet Being and Some Philosophers remains not so much an historical investigation (although it could only have been written by a scholar steeped in the history of philosophy) but, in the words of its author, a philosophical book, and a dogmatically philosophical one at that. Its passionate vigour has proven, over many years, at once fresh and provocative. Indeed, the appendix to this revised edition contains critiques of the book by two Thomists as well as Gilson's replies to their objections. |
| being and some philosophers: Being and Some Philosophers Etienne Gilson, 1952 The study of being was one of the main preoccupations of Gilson's scholarly and intellectual life. Being and Some Philosophers is at once a testament to the persistence of these concerns and an important landmark in the history of the question of being. The book charts the ways in which being is translated across history, from unity in Plato and substance in Aristotle to essence in Avicenna and the act of existence in Aquinas. It examines the vicissitudes of essence and existence in Suarez and Christian Wolff, in Hegel and Kierkegaard, in order to uncover the metaphysical and existential foundations of modern thought. And yet Being and Some Philosophers remains not so much an historical investigation (although it could only have been written by a scholar steeped in the history of philosophy) but, in the words of its author, a philosophical book, and a dogmatically philosophical one at that. Its passionate vigour has proven, over many years, at once fresh and provocative. Indeed, the appendix to this revised edition contains critiques of the book by two Thomists as well as Gilson's replies to their objections. |
| being and some philosophers: Being and Some Philosophers Etienne Gilson, 2003-01 |
| being and some philosophers: Being and Some Philosophers. Etienne Gilson. 2nd Edition... Étienne Gilson, 1952 |
| being and some philosophers: The Book Of Dead Philosophers Simon Critchley, 2011-08-04 Starting from the premise that philosophers' deaths have been as interesting as their lives, Simon Critchley looks at the strange circumstances in which some philosophers have died and then confronts the big themes - in this case, what 'a good death' means and how to live with the knowledge of death. The book consists of short entries on various philosophers, cataloguing the manner of their demises and linking this to their central ideas, from the Pre-Socratics to Rousseau, Kant and Nietzsche among many others. The book concludes with Critchley's thoughts on the ideal of the philosophical death as a way of denouncing contemporary delusions and sophistries, what Francis Bacon saw as the Idols of the Tribe, the Den, the Market-Place and the Theatre (incidentally, Bacon died in a particularly cold winter in London in 1626 from a cold contracted after trying to stuff a chicken with snow as an experiment in refrigeration). |
| being and some philosophers: The Unity of Philosophical Experience Etienne Gilson, 1999 Lectures ... given at Harvard University in the first half of the academic year 1936-37--Foreword. |
| being and some philosophers: New Thinking about Propositions Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, Jeff Speaks, 2014 Philosophy, science, and common sense all refer to propositions—things we believe and say, and things which are true or false. But there is no consensus on what sorts of things these entities are. Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, and Jeff Speaks argue that commitment to propositions is indispensable, and each defend their own views on the debate. |
| being and some philosophers: The Fragmentation of Being Kris McDaniel, 2017-08-04 The Fragmentation of Being offers answers to some of the most fundamental questions in ontology. There are many kinds of beings but are there also many kinds of being? The world contains a variety of objects, each of which, let us provisionally assume, exists, but do some objects exist in different ways? Do some objects enjoy more being or existence than other objects? Are there different ways in which one object might enjoy more being than another? Most contemporary metaphysicians would answer no to each of these questions. So widespread is this consensus that the questions this book addressed are rarely even raised let alone explicitly answered. But Kris McDaniel carefully examines a wide range of reasons for answering each of these questions with a yes. In doing so, he connects these questions with many important metaphysical topics, including substance and accident, time and persistence, the nature of ontological categories, possibility and necessity, presence and absence, persons and value, ground and consequence, and essence and accident. In addition to discussing contemporary problems and theories, McDaniel also discusses the ontological views of many important figures in the history of philosophy, including Aquinas, Aristotle, Descartes, Heidegger, Husserl, Kant, Leibniz, Meinong, and many more. |
| being and some philosophers: God and Philosophy Etienne Gilson, 2002-01-01 In this classic work, the eminent Catholic philosopher Étienne Gilson deals with one of the most important and perplexing metaphysical problems: the relation between our notion of God and demonstrations of his existence. Gilson examines Greek, Christian, and modern philosophy as well as the thinking that has grown out of our age of science in this fundamental analysis of the problem of God. [I] commend to another generation of seekers and students this deeply earnest and yet wistfully gentle little essay on the most important (and often, at least nowadays, the most neglected) of all metaphysical--and existential--questions. . . . The historical sweep is breathtaking, the one-liners arresting, and the style, both intellectual and literary, altogether engaging. --Jaroslav Pelikan, from the foreword We have come to expect from the pen of M. Gilson not only an accurate exposition of the thought of the great philosophers, ancient and modern, but what is of much more importance and of greater interest, a keen and sympathetic insight into the reasons for that thought. The present volume does not fail to fulfill our expectations. It should be read by every Christian thinker. --Ralph O. Dates, America |
| being and some philosophers: The Failures of Philosophy Stephen Gaukroger, 2020-11-03 Taking the long view of the history of philosophy, The Failures of Philosophy shows how philosophy has in fact collapsed several times, been completely abandoned, sometimes for centuries, and been replaced by something quite different from philosophy. The book focuses on what are historically the most significant failures of philosophy: attempts to provide an account of 'the good life' and how to live; to establish philosophy as a discipline that can stand in judgement over and assess other forms of thought; attempts to establish philosophy as a theory of everything; and attempts to construe it as a discipline that parallels or rationalizes the empirical and mathematical sciences, building up technical credentials that mimic those of science. The central argument of the book is that examination of these failures tells us much more about the nature of philosophical enquiry, and about the ultimate point of the exercise, than its successes possibly could. Examination of its failures shows us the significant differences in the way in which philosophers have conceived of the point at different times, and why they have been obliged to shift focus. It tells us why philosophy has been thought to bring distinctive skills to questions, and whether these are actually fruitful skills. And, above all, it allows us to open up the question whether philosophy has anything to offer over and above other ways of engaging cognate questions-- |
| being and some philosophers: Not Saved Peter Sloterdijk, 2017-05-23 One can rightly say of Peter Sloterdijk that each of his essays and lectures is also an unwritten book. That is why the texts presented here, which sketch a philosophical physiognomy of Martin Heidegger, should also be characterized as a collected renunciation of exhaustiveness. In order to situate Heidegger's thought in the history of ideas and problems, Peter Sloterdijk approaches Heidegger's work with questions such as: If Western philosophy emerged from the spirit of the polis, what are we to make of the philosophical suitability of a man who never made a secret of his stubborn attachment to rural life? Is there a provincial truth of which the cosmopolitan city knows nothing? Is there a truth in country roads and cabins that would be able to undermine the universities with their standardized languages and globally influential discourses? From where does this odd professor speak, when from his professorial chair in Freiburg he claims to inquire into what lies beyond the history of Western metaphysics? Sloterdijk also considers several other crucial twentieth-century thinkers who provide some needed contrast for the philosophical physiognomy of Martin Heidegger. A consideration of Niklas Luhmann as a kind of contemporary version of the Devil's Advocate, a provocative critical interpretation of Theodor Adorno's philosophy that focuses on its theological underpinnings and which also includes reflections on the philosophical significance of hyperbole, and a short sketch of the pessimistic thought of Emil Cioran all round out and deepen Sloterdijk's attempts to think with, against, and beyond Heidegger. Finally, in essays such as Domestication of Being and the Rules for the Human Park, which incited an international controversy around the time of its publication and has been translated afresh for this volume, Sloterdijk develops some of his most intriguing and important ideas on anthropogenesis, humanism, technology, and genetic engineering. |
| being and some philosophers: Philosophy and The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy N. Joll, 2016-04-30 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy provides an excellent way of looking at some intriguing issues in philosophy, from vegetarianism and Artificial Intelligence to God, space and time. This is an entertaining yet thought provoking volume for students, philosophers and fans of The Hitchhiker's series. |
| being and some philosophers: Towards Non-being Graham Priest, 2005 This text presents an account of the semantics of intentional language. It proceeds in terms of objects that may be either existent or non-existent, at worlds that may be either possible or impossible. The text will be of interest to those concerned with intentionality in the philosophy of mind or philosophy of language. |
| being and some philosophers: Structure and Being Lorenz B. Puntel, 2010-11-01 |
| being and some philosophers: Anxiety Bettina Bergo, 2021 Philosopher Bettina Bergo studies the sweeping history of anxiety as manifested in European philosophy over the last 250 years. Readers interested in intellectual history--even with a superficial knowledge of philosophy--will find rich material here, and insight into our present-day age of anxiety. The book will trace important connections that link studies of anxiety in philosophy, from Kant's transcendental relegation of emotions to philosophical anthropology, to Levinas' phenomenology, among numerous others. Focusing on anxiety as embodied sensation and an emotion, Bergo opens new windows of thought, putting philosophers whose work has never before been compared into dialogue with one another. |
| being and some philosophers: Being Inclined Mark Sinclair, 2019-10-24 Being Inclined is the first book-length study in English of the work of Félix Ravaisson, France's most influential philosopher in the second half of the nineteenth century. Mark Sinclair shows how Ravaisson, in his great work Of Habit (1838), understands habit as tendency and inclination in a way that provides the basis for a philosophy of nature and a general metaphysics. In examining Ravaisson's ideas against the background of the history of philosophy, and in the light of later developments in French thought, Sinclair shows how Ravaisson gives an original account of the nature of habit as inclination, within a metaphysical framework quite different to those of his predecessors in the philosophical tradition. Being Inclined sheds new light on the history of modern French philosophy and argues for the importance of the neglected nineteenth-century French spiritualist tradition. It also shows that Ravaisson's philosophy of inclination, of being-inclined, is of great import for contemporary philosophy, and particularly for the contemporary metaphysics of powers given that ideas about tendency have recently come to prominence in discussions concerning dispositions, laws, and the nature of causation. Being Inclined therefore offers a detailed and faithful contextualist study of Ravaisson's masterpiece, demonstrating its continued importance for contemporary thought. |
| being and some philosophers: Being and Time Martin Heidegger, 2008-07-22 What is the meaning of being? This is the central question of Martin Heidegger's profoundly important work, in which the great philosopher seeks to explain the basic problems of existence. A central influence on later philosophy, literature, art, and criticism—as well as existentialism and much of postmodern thought—Being and Time forever changed the intellectual map of the modern world. As Richard Rorty wrote in the New York Times Book Review, You cannot read most of the important thinkers of recent times without taking Heidegger's thought into account. This first paperback edition of John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson's definitive translation also features a new foreword by Heidegger scholar Taylor Carman. |
| being and some philosophers: The Activity of Being Aryeh Kosman, 2013-03-01 Understanding “what something is” has long occupied philosophers, and no Western thinker has had more influence on the nature of being than Aristotle. Focusing on a reinterpretation of the concept of energeia as “activity,” Aryeh Kosman reexamines Aristotle’s ontology and some of our most basic assumptions about the great philosopher’s thought. |
| being and some philosophers: Philosophers at Table Raymond D. Boisvert, Lisa Heldke, 2016-04-15 When you boil it down, one of the most important things we do each day is eat. The question of eating—what, and how—may seem simple at first, but it is dense with complex meanings, reflecting myriad roles that food plays and has played over the centuries. In fact, as Raymond D. Boisvert and Lisa Heldke show in this book, it’s difficult to imagine a more philosophically charged act than eating. Philosophers at Table explores the philosophical scaffolding that supports this crucial aspect of everyday life, showing that we are not just creatures with minds, but also with stomachs. Examining a cornucopia of literary works, myths, histories, and film—not to mention philosophical ideas—the authors make the case for a bona fide philosophy of food. They look at Babette’s Feast as an argument for hospitality as a central ethical virtue. They compare fast food in Accra to the molecular gastronomy of Spain as a way of considering the nature of food as art. And they bite into a slug—which is, unsurprisingly, completely gross—to explore tasting as a learning tool, a way of knowing. A surprising, original take on something we have not philosophically savored enough, Philosophers at Table invites readers to think in fresh ways about the simple and important act of eating. |
| being and some philosophers: Being, Essence and Substance in Plato and Aristotle Paul Ricoeur, 2013-09-03 Paul Ricoeur (1913-2005) was one of the outstanding French philosophers of the 20th century and his work is widely read in the English-speaking world. This unique volume comprises the lectures that Ricoeur gave on Plato and Aristotle at the University of Strasbourg in 1953-54. The aim of these lectures is to analyse the metaphysics of Plato and Aristotle and to discern in their work the ontological foundations of Western philosophy. The relation between Plato and Aristotle is commonly portrayed as a contrast between a philosophy of essence and a philosophy of substance, but Ricoeur shows that this opposition is too simple. Aristotelian ontology is not a simple antithesis to Platonism: the radical ontology of Aristotle stands in a far more subtle relation of continuity and opposition to that of Plato and it is this relation we have to reconstruct and understand. Ricoeur’s lectures offer a brilliant analysis of the great works of Plato and Aristotle which has withstood the test of time. They also provide a unique insight into the development of Ricoeur’s thinking in the early 1950s, revealing that, even at this early stage of his work, Ricoeur was focused sharply on issues of language and the text. |
| being and some philosophers: Being a Philosopher David W. Hamlyn, 2002-11 First Published in 2004. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company. |
| being and some philosophers: The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy Eckart Förster, 2012-03-15 Kant declared that philosophy began in 1781 with his Critique of Pure Reason. In 1806 Hegel announced that philosophy had now been completed. Eckart Förster examines the reasons behind these claims and assesses the steps that led in such a short time from Kant's (Bbeginning to Hegel's (Bend. He concludes that, in an unexpected yet significant sense, both Kant and Hegel were indeed right. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy follows the unfolding of a key idea during this exceptionally productive period: the Kantian idea that philosophy can be scientific and, consequently, can be completed. Förster's study combines historical research with philosophical insight and leads him to propose a new thesis. The development of Kant's transcendental philosophy in his three Critiques, Förster claims, resulted in a fundamental distinction between (Bintellectual intuition and (Bintuitive understanding. Overlooked until now, this distinction yields two takes on how to pursue philosophy as science after Kant. One line of thought culminates in Fichte's theory of freedom (Wissenschaftslehre), while the other--and here Förster brings Goethe's significance to the fore--results in Goethe's transformation of the Kantian idea of an intuitive understanding in light of Spinoza's third kind of knowledge. Both strands are brought together in Hegel and propel his split from Schelling. Förster's work makes an original contribution to our understanding of the classical era of German philosophy--an expanding interest within the Anglophone philosophical community. |
| being and some philosophers: The Dawn of Analysis Scott Soames, 2005-01-30 This is a major, wide-ranging history of analytic philosophy since 1900, told by one of the tradition's leading contemporary figures. The first volume takes the story from 1900 to mid-century. The second brings the history up to date. As Scott Soames tells it, the story of analytic philosophy is one of great but uneven progress, with leading thinkers making important advances toward solving the tradition's core problems. Though no broad philosophical position ever achieved lasting dominance, Soames argues that two methodological developments have, over time, remade the philosophical landscape. These are (1) analytic philosophers' hard-won success in understanding, and distinguishing the notions of logical truth, a priori truth, and necessary truth, and (2) gradual acceptance of the idea that philosophical speculation must be grounded in sound prephilosophical thought. Though Soames views this history in a positive light, he also illustrates the difficulties, false starts, and disappointments endured along the way. As he engages with the work of his predecessors and contemporaries--from Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein to Donald Davidson and Saul Kripke--he seeks to highlight their accomplishments while also pinpointing their shortcomings, especially where their perspectives were limited by an incomplete grasp of matters that have now become clear. Soames himself has been at the center of some of the tradition's most important debates, and throughout writes with exceptional ease about its often complex ideas. His gift for clear exposition makes the history as accessible to advanced undergraduates as it will be important to scholars. Despite its centrality to philosophy in the English-speaking world, the analytic tradition in philosophy has had very few synthetic histories. This will be the benchmark against which all future accounts will be measured. |
| being and some philosophers: Empty Ideas Peter Unger, 2017 During the middle of the twentieth century, philosophers generally agreed that, by contrast with science, philosophy should offer no substantial thoughts about the general nature of concrete reality. Instead, philosophers offered conceptual truths. It is widely assumed that, since 1970, things have changed greatly. This book argues that's an illusion that prevails because of the failure to differentiate between concretely substantial and concretely empty ideas. |
| being and some philosophers: Being and Time Martin Heidegger, 1996-01-01 A new, definitive translation of Heidegger's most important work. |
| being and some philosophers: Philosophy Between the Lines Arthur M. Melzer, 2014-09-09 “Shines a floodlight on a topic that has been cloaked in obscurity . . . a landmark work in both intellectual history and political theory” (The Wall Street Journal). Philosophical esotericism—the practice of communicating one’s unorthodox thoughts “between the lines”—was a common practice until the end of the eighteenth century. Despite its long and well-documented history, however, esotericism is often dismissed today as a rare occurrence. But by ignoring esotericism, we risk cutting ourselves off from a full understanding of Western philosophical thought. Walking readers through both an ancient (Plato) and a modern (Machiavelli) esoteric work, Arthur M. Melzer explains what esotericism is—and is not. It relies not on secret codes, but simply on a more intensive use of familiar rhetorical techniques like metaphor, irony, and insinuation. Melzer explores the various motives that led thinkers in different times and places to engage in this strange practice, while also exploring the motives that lead more recent thinkers not only to dislike and avoid this practice but to deny its very existence. In the book’s final section, “A Beginner’s Guide to Esoteric Reading,” Melzer turns to how we might once again cultivate the long-forgotten art of reading esoteric works. The first comprehensive, book-length study of the history and theoretical basis of philosophical esotericism, Philosophy Between the Lines is “a treasure-house of insight and learning. It is that rare thing: an eye-opening book . . . By making the world before Enlightenment appear as strange as it truly was, [Melzer] makes our world stranger than we think it is” (George Kateb, Professor of Politics, Emeritus, at Princeton University). “Brilliant, pellucid, and meticulously researched.” —City Journal |
| being and some philosophers: The Philosophy Book DK, 2024-09-03 Get to grips with the concepts that shaped the way we think about ethics, politics, and our place in the universe. Explaining the big ideas and groundbreaking theories of key philosophers clearly and simply, The Philosophy Book is the perfect one-stop guide to philosophy and the history of how we think. Untangling knotty theories and shedding light on abstract concepts, entries explore and explain each complex idea with easy-to-follow explanations and innovative visuals. Explore the history of philosophy, from ancient Greece and China to today, and find out how theories from over 2,000 years ago are still relevant to our modern lives. Follow the progression of human ideas and meet the world's most influential philosophers – from Plato and Confucius through René Descartes and Mary Wollstonecraft to Ludwig Wittgenstein and Judith Butler. Dive into this phenomenal philosophy book to discover: -An accessible guide to philosophy, covering every major school and movement throughout history. -The clear and detailed text explains the most groundbreaking philosophical concepts and theories ever devised, while bold illustrations and pull-out quotes bring each idea to life. -Fully revised and updated to cover any developments in the field over the last 5–10 years. -Biography and context boxes place each idea in its wider historical, cultural, and social context. Your Philosophical Questions, Simply Explained If you thought it was difficult to learn philosophy and its many concepts, The Philosophy Book presents the key ideas in a clear layout. Find out what philosophers thought about the nature of reality and the fundamental questions we ask ourselves: What is the meaning of life? What is the Universe made of? And work your way through the different branches of philosophy, such as metaphysics and ethics, from ancient and modern thinkers. The Big Ideas Series With millions of copies sold worldwide, The Philosophy Book is part of the award-winning Big Ideas series from DK. The series uses striking visuals and engaging writing, making big topics easy to understand. |
| being and some philosophers: Gilson's Being and Some Philosophers John C. Dewing, 1967 |
| being and some philosophers: Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth Blake E. Hestir, 2016-04-21 Blake E. Hestir's examination of Plato's conception of truth challenges a long tradition of interpretation in ancient scholarship. |
| being and some philosophers: Philosophical Essays on Various Subjects ... With some remarks on Mr. Locke's Essay on Human Understanding ... The fifth edition, corrected Isaac Watts, 1823 |
| being and some philosophers: The Existence of God Francois De Salignac De Mothe- Fenelon, 1894 |
| being and some philosophers: On Being and Essence Saint Thomas (Aquinas), 1968 Offers more the reader more aids -- including notes and a commentary -- than does any other translation. |
| being and some philosophers: Being and Authenticity Xunwu Chen, 2021-12-28 This book presents a creative approach to the problem of individual authenticity. What is authenticity? What are its necessary conditions? How is an authentic self possible in society? What are the relationships of authenticity, morality, and happiness? The book examines a wide range of questions in Eastern and Western thought, to which it gives novel answers. |
| being and some philosophers: Freedom Regained Julian Baggini, 2015-10-05 Originally published in English by Granta Publications under the title Freedom Regained--Title page verso. |
| being and some philosophers: Some Philosophy of the Hermetics ... David Patterson Hatch, 1898 |
| being and some philosophers: The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being Guy Fletcher, 2015-07-30 The concept of well-being is one of the oldest and most important topics in philosophy and ethics, going back to ancient Greek philosophy. Following the boom in happiness studies in the last few years it has moved to centre stage, grabbing media headlines and the attention of scientists, psychologists and economists. Yet little is actually known about well-being and it is an idea that is often poorly articulated. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being provides a comprehensive, outstanding guide and reference source to the key topics and debates in this exciting subject. Comprising over 40 chapters by a team of international contributors, the Handbook is divided into six parts: well-being in the history of philosophy current theories of well-being, including hedonism and perfectionism examples of well-being and its opposites, including friendship and virtue and pain and death theoretical issues, such as well-being and value, harm, identity and well-being and children well-being in moral and political philosophy well-being and related subjects, including law, economics and medicine. Essential reading for students and researchers in ethics and political philosophy, it is also an invaluable resource for those in related disciplines such as psychology, politics and sociology. |
| being and some philosophers: Some Problems of Philosophy William James, 1916 |
| being and some philosophers: Non-being Sara Bernstein, Tyron Goldschmidt, 2021 Nonexistence is ubiquitous, yet mysterious. This volume explores some of the most puzzling questions about non-being and nonexistence, from metaphysics to ethics and beyond: the contributors offer answers from diverse philosophical perspectives, drawing on analytic, continental, Buddhist, and Jewish philosophical traditions. |
| being and some philosophers: Being No One Thomas Metzinger, 2004-08-20 According to Thomas Metzinger, no such things as selves exist in the world: nobody ever had or was a self. All that exists are phenomenal selves, as they appear in conscious experience. The phenomenal self, however, is not a thing but an ongoing process; it is the content of a transparent self-model. In Being No One, Metzinger, a German philosopher, draws strongly on neuroscientific research to present a representationalist and functional analysis of what a consciously experienced first-person perspective actually is. Building a bridge between the humanities and the empirical sciences of the mind, he develops new conceptual toolkits and metaphors; uses case studies of unusual states of mind such as agnosia, neglect, blindsight, and hallucinations; and offers new sets of multilevel constraints for the concept of consciousness. Metzinger's central question is: How exactly does strong, consciously experienced subjectivity emerge out of objective events in the natural world? His epistemic goal is to determine whether conscious experience, in particular the experience of being someone that results from the emergence of a phenomenal self, can be analyzed on subpersonal levels of description. He also asks if and how our Cartesian intuitions that subjective experiences as such can never be reductively explained are themselves ultimately rooted in the deeper representational structure of our conscious minds. |
| being and some philosophers: Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale Debra Satz, 2012-04-19 The noted philosopher Debra Satz takes a skeptical view of markets, pointing out that free markets are not always a force for good. The idea of free exchange of child labor, human organs, reproductive services, weapons, life saving medicines, and addcitive drugs, strike many as toxic to human values. She asks: What considerations ought to guide the debates about such markets?--Provided by publisher. |
英语中being的用法？ - 知乎
being 表示生物——a living creature human beings a strange being from another planet. being 表示人的情感\本质——your mind and all of your feelings. I hated Stefan with my whole being. …
有大佬知道is doing和 is being用法区别吗？？ - 知乎
being. been. am. is. are. was. were. 以上仅仅是一个be动词的情况，当be 动词和其它动词进行组合排列形成主被动的时候，情况会进一步复杂， 如： was/were to be. am/is/are to be. …
怎么理解西方哲学的 being？ - 知乎
Being理所应当地成为了实在的根本和终极要素。 当巴门尼德把“being”当作一个特殊的“什么”来予以追问，这就开创了本体论的传统。巴门尼德推论的关键在于利用希腊语中eimi具有“是”（系 …
being什么时候用？ - 知乎
being. been. am. is. are. was. were. 以上仅仅是一个be动词的情况，当be 动词和其它动词进行组合排列形成主被动的时候，情况会进一步复杂， 如： was/were to be. am/is/are to be. …
He is being smart中为什么加个being，直接去掉不更好吗? - 知乎
He is being smart. 本来聪明是一个特性，加上进行时就变成展示、表现这种特性(确实具有该特性)，又或者故意伪装这种特性(并不具有该特性)。所以He is being smart有两种意思，一个是"他 …
Being 和 Existence 意思上有什么差别？在什么语境下使用？ - 知乎
Mar 22, 2015 · being 在哲学用语上意义似乎是最广的：Something that exists or is conceived as existing.（Used in philosophical language as the widest term applicable to all objects of sense …
如何关闭 Bing 安全搜索的严格模式？ - 知乎
如题，见图。如何关闭Bing的安全搜索？或者取消安全搜索的严格模式？参考资料，修改该设置，需要先修改区…
论文投稿时要求提交Author Agreement，该怎么弄？ - 知乎
We the undersigned declare that this manuscript entitled “文章标题” is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. We would …
伦理学中的「well-being」应该如何翻译成中文？ - 知乎
well-being要是直译的话，翻译作“好的存在状态”。well就是好，being就是存在。一定要强调它规范性的一面的话，那就翻译作“应该变成的状态”。但我觉得，“幸福”，“福利”，“福祉”，“生活质 …
edge浏览器网页与此站点链接不安全怎么解决？ - 知乎
Sep 19, 2021 · 知乎，中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台，于 2011 年 1 月正式上线，以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解，找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。知乎 …
英语中being的用法？ - 知乎
being 表示生物——a living creature human beings a strange being from another planet. being 表示人的情感\本质——your mind and all of your feelings. I hated Stefan with my whole being. …
有大佬知道is doing和 is being用法区别吗？？ - 知乎
being. been. am. is. are. was. were. 以上仅仅是一个be动词的情况，当be 动词和其它动词进行组合排列形成主被动的时候，情况会进一步复杂， 如： was/were to be. am/is/are to be. …
怎么理解西方哲学的 being？ - 知乎
Being理所应当地成为了实在的根本和终极要素。 当巴门尼德把“being”当作一个特殊的“什么”来予以追问，这就开创了本体论的传统。巴门尼德推论的关键在于利用希腊语中eimi具有“是”（系 …
being什么时候用？ - 知乎
being. been. am. is. are. was. were. 以上仅仅是一个be动词的情况，当be 动词和其它动词进行组合排列形成主被动的时候，情况会进一步复杂， 如： was/were to be. am/is/are to be. …
He is being smart中为什么加个being，直接去掉不更好吗? - 知乎
He is being smart. 本来聪明是一个特性，加上进行时就变成展示、表现这种特性(确实具有该特性)，又或者故意伪装这种特性(并不具有该特性)。所以He is being smart有两种意思，一个是"他 …
Being 和 Existence 意思上有什么差别？在什么语境下使用？ - 知乎
Mar 22, 2015 · being 在哲学用语上意义似乎是最广的：Something that exists or is conceived as existing.（Used in philosophical language as the widest term applicable to all objects of sense …
如何关闭 Bing 安全搜索的严格模式？ - 知乎
如题，见图。如何关闭Bing的安全搜索？或者取消安全搜索的严格模式？参考资料，修改该设置，需要先修改区…
论文投稿时要求提交Author Agreement，该怎么弄？ - 知乎
We the undersigned declare that this manuscript entitled “文章标题” is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. We would …
伦理学中的「well-being」应该如何翻译成中文？ - 知乎
well-being要是直译的话，翻译作“好的存在状态”。well就是好，being就是存在。一定要强调它规范性的一面的话，那就翻译作“应该变成的状态”。但我觉得，“幸福”，“福利”，“福祉”，“生活质 …
edge浏览器网页与此站点链接不安全怎么解决？ - 知乎
Sep 19, 2021 · 知乎，中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台，于 2011 年 1 月正式上线，以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解，找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。知乎 …
